X-Ftn-To: George Hammond 

George Hammond  wrote:
>[Hammond]
>Thanks for rolling over and going cutsie on me moron.
>You can't post an intelligent statement if you had too...
>just OT kook one-liners.

The man is smart. I tried talking to you and look what I've got. The
only reason why you're here, and not on some mailing list of
professionals, is that you'd be immediately unsubscribed for spamming
and misbehavior. Where do you think the real experts talk, on
newsgroups where the kooks like you can go and disturb their
concentration? They have their own mailing-lists on university
servers, of course. Once they recognize you as their peer, you'll
probably get an invitation to join. I could find several lists on
google. If you join, and if you're very, very humble and unimposing
("I accidentally stumbled upon some thought-provoking data; IMHO, they
might be interesting for those who study the bio morpho-genic field
and similar effects - if any of you would be so kind, I would really
appreciate your thoughts on my findings"), some of the experts there
will give you an evaluation of your thesis, for free. It will be
negative, of course, but you'll never get anything else.

As for the Christian definitions of God, see:
http://personalwebs.myriad.net/ffwb/wgod.htm
http://home.regent.edu/rodmwil/10teach-01.htm
http://www.scborromeo.org/ccc/p1s1c1.htm#III
http://www.soulocity.com/faq.html#WhoIsGod
http://www.greattrumpet.org/godattributesnature.htm
http://www.utm.edu/research/iep/g/god.htm

These pages contain enough theological information for you to be able
to reconsider your article; I suggest that you take an especially
close look at http://www.scborromeo.org/ccc/p1s1c1.htm#III , the
excerpt from the Catholic catechism, which will give you an idea how
to express and elaborate your arguments; it is an example of a
well-written and argumented article.

-- 
Homepage: http://www.danijel.org