"Premananda Dasa"  wrote:
>>Thanks David :), I was already seriously considering unsubscribing,
>>because the situation didn't look like something I'd want to be a part
>>of.
>
>You are the one who started to provoke and write offensive things about the
>Gaudiya Vaisnava tradition. Then expect an answer that is befitting.

A befitting answer would be to disassemble each thesis I offered, find
the weak spots or contradictions, and show the opposite examples, thus
clearly proving me wrong. Or, analyzing my points and seeing where
they make sense, analyzing your own stands and seeing weak spots in
them (like presuming that membership in Gaudiya sampradaya makes you
automatically right), and learning more about what you thought you
knew.

Instead you went ad hominem and thus admitted defeat. If your system
of beliefs is so weak, that I can get you into fits of anger while I'm
having a nice time juggling with arguments, then your philosophy is
really regrettable.

You said something about vedic science. I don't know what they taught
you about science, but if you're on a college and the professor asked
you to prove Pitagora's theorem, and you got mad at him, telling him
that his mother is a slut and his father is a pedophile, I don't think
you'd gain much respect in scientific circles. ;)

-----
Web (Kundalini-yoga): http://danijel.cjb.net