chekitan@bahnhof.se (Jahnu) wrote:
>On Sun, 19 Sep 1999 14:53:14 GMT, dturina@geocities.com (Danijel
>Turina),wrote:
>Such an understanding can clearly not come from within the
>confinements of the mind. It has to come from Krishna through His
>bona-fida representative in disciplic succession. If it does not, it
>is unscientific and useless for all purposes. 

I think your definition of science dates back to the dark ages, to the
times of deduction and authorities. The scientific method is this:
-choose the object of observation
-apply the preliminary observation and from it create a theory
-according to the theory, make an assumption
-test that assumption with further experiments
-if the observation of the results is in alignment with the
predictions, the theory can be accepted until it is in some other way
disproved.

This is the scientific method.

>Please just tell us the truth - that you are a complete fraud -
>because if it is as you say, that you actually guide people in
>spiritual life, these people are in a bad shape, if they think you
>have anything of value to offer. Who would take your vague,
>unenlightened, wishy washy, hodge podge speculations over the pure
>original teachings of Krishna in the Bhagavad Gita?

I am who I am. My students know me better than you ever will, and
their confidence in me isn't built on thin air.

>If it weren't tragic it would be hilarious.

It must really hurt to be you. I'm so sorry. I hope someone gives you
all the love and affection that you need.

-- 
Web (Kundalini-yoga): http://danijel.cjb.net