vdayal@castle.net (Virender Dayal) wrote:
>The astronomical observations do not threaten Srimad-Bhagavatam. 

Then why are you so invested in mixing unrelated issues? Leave the
astronomers do their work, accept their results with a grain of salt,
and read Srimad Bhagavatam as a spiritual text, not as a science
manual.

>I have no evidence of the numbers given by scientists as reality.  

Looking at it this way, nobody really knows anything, we could be
monkeys plugged into a computer on an alien spaceship, which projects
the artificial reality upon us to test our reactions. You can't prove
this false, you can only say that this assumption doesn't look like a
good model of the reality. The scientists are supposed to be aware of
their limitations and take their own results skeptically, but
unfortunately most of them don't, they are doing the same thing you
are: they are drawing spiritual conclusions from the material
observations, and you are drawing material conclusions from a
scripture. That is the wrong approach, those things should not be
mixed, or we'll have serious problems.

>What is reality???  Do you know?  

Accidentally I do, because I teach yoga.

>[rest of the garbage deleted]

Ditto, my friend, rest of the garbage deleted.

-- 
Web (Kundalini-yoga): http://danijel.cjb.net