soybean2k@hotmail.com wrote:
>Hare Krsna Danijel,
>
>I think I can answer you: your problem is that you give free
>reign to the idea (an idea unique to the 20th century, with its
>roots in the romantic movement of the 19th century) that
>*how you feel* is the ultimate yardstick. It's not. A person
>chanting the mahamantra has the results, period. Whether
>he/she "feels it" is completely irrelevant. 

This, I admit, is an original approach to the subject. :)
Are you saying that the state of the subject is irrelevant to the
effect of mantra? If so, make a great contribution to the world:
compile this program here

program mm;
uses crt;
begin
  repeat
    writeln('hare krsna hare krsna');
    writeln('krsna krsna hare hare');
    writeln('hare rama hare rama');
    writeln('rama rama hare hare');
    writeln;
  until keypressed;
end.

with a standard Pascal compiler (it shouldn't be difficult to adapt it
to other languages, and it works on any platform whatsoever), and
enlighten your computer. Just keep it running, and eventually,
depending on the CPU and graphics speed (more mantra, more
enlightement), it will become conscious of God.

If you don't become bored in the meantime.

Please, tell me that you were kidding.

-- 
Web (Kundalini-yoga): http://danijel.cjb.net