"Sundarananda Dasa"  wrote:
>> >No, but you are the guy who thinks he is Jesus.
>>
>> Naaah, you mixed your pots. Just because Jesus and I know the same
>> reality and testify for it doesn't mean that we're one person. Many
>
>What do you _really_ know about what Jesus experienced?

Everything. I know him within, and he knows me.

>> are the surfaces of water, one is the moon that is reflected on them.
>> What do you expect anyway, that I teach yoga, and that I do not know
>> God intimately?
>
>You are not even teaching yoga Danijel, because you haven´t learnt it from a
>proper guru. Every serious student of any yoga system knows that it has to
>be studied under the guidance of a guru who has the proper qualification.
>And you are not qualified, because you have no guru. 

:) That's a nice theory, tell it to Jesus. He "wasn't qualified"
either. To you, he would be just a blaspheming carpenter's son from
Galilea. No prophets came from there, therefore he's not authentic. ;)

>What you are teaching
>your students is what you think is right, but it is not real kundalini yoga.
>Even if it was, that system is very insignificant in comparison to
>bhakti-yoga. Bhakti-yoga is the highest yoga system, as said by Sri Krishna
>in Bhagavad-gita.

"It's not, but even if it was, I would be better". :))) What a bunch
of crap. You don't even know what Kundalini is. Kundalini is the
engine behind bhakti. Without the awakened and active Kundalini
Shakti, bhakti is just an empty show. Kundalini is the force that
aligns the bhakta with God, it's the God's inner presence. A real guru
can awaken a person's Kundalini with mere presence, word, look or a
touch. That is what tells you if someone is qualified, not his
lineage. A real guru, who is able to awaken God's presence in people,
_is_ God's presence. Lineages are good for maintaining such presence
on earth, but when lineages are corrupted, the new ones have to be
founded. The first guru has no guru besides God. The real guru is to
be found within.

>>Then I would be a fake just like Prabhupada, who
>> didn't see God, but he taught about him. You guys are completely
>> confused. First you say that I'm a false guru because I do not know
>> God. When I write from the position of the one who knows, you say that
>> I'm a megalomaniac. Make up your minds. The texts that I wrote
>
>First you showed off as being a teacher of kundalini-yoga, but then your
>insanity began to show through in your "I am a Messiah like Jesus" postings.

What do you expect, me being a shaktipat master, and not knowing God
intimately? That would be a contradiction, and I could be rightfully
accused of posing. But since I am not, you should have expected my
degree of realization, and not have taken it as a surprise.

>>from
>> nirvikalpa samadhi, those written from the position of the Absolute,
>> you confuse with the relative. Your minds are in a blur and you lack
>> any realization. How could you possibly understand me? Any real
>
>I don´t even want to understand you, because I don´t care what you
>experience. This nirvikalpasamadhi is like a drop of water in comparison to
>the nectar of meditation on Sri Krishna.

Since you have no knowledge of either, your word on these matters is
irrelevant.

>The Srimad Bhagavatam says that the bliss of realization of the impersonal
>aspect of God is very insignificant in comparison to the realization of the
>personal God Sri Krishna. This is also our direct experience.

No, this is _my_ direct experience. But from your standpoint,
realization of the impersonal aspect is far, far above you. You are
just putting up an empty show without any substance whatsoever. That
has been demonstrated by your reactions to my words spoken from atma
brahma advaita state. If you had direct experience of that, it would
have been completely normal for you that I am One in all beings.

>>bhakta
>> would know me instantly, because his realization of God would be real
>> and he could understand my words. That is not the case with you.
>
>The fact is that the Vaishnavas have realized the impersonal aspect of God
>as well, 

Yes, all vaisnavas have, but here I saw none of those.

>and they have gone beyond that point to realizing higher levels of
>the Divinity. 

That is also true, but it has nothing to do with you.

>You will not get there as long as you are being offensive to
>the great souls who can teach and help you attain that realization of God.

I am already there.

>>You
>> get yourself entangled in your silly ideas of insult of authority,
>> which is completely ridiculous since you are the embodiments of
>> insult.
>
>The Guru is not an authority. Guru is the meeting point between the
>searching soul and God.

That is true.

>Acharyam mam vijaniyat; "know the Acharya (Guru) to be My very Self", says
>Sri Krishna in the Bhagavata-purana.

Of course. My very Self is the ultimate guru.

>Sri Krishna is in everybody´s heart in the form of Paramatma, and by His
>guidance the soul gets connection with a Guru coming in disciplic succession
>who will personally guide the soul on the spiritual path of love and
>devotion to Sri Krishna.
>You haven´t understood even this basic truth.

:) Not only have I understood it, I have implemented it in my life. I
found God within my own being and realized Him, and He guided me.

>It was immature of those devotees to speak like that. 

You too speak like that, because you are ignorant and arrogant.

>A true Vaishnava
>doesn´t criticize other religions or gurus without a good reason. It is a
>totally different matter when persons like you begin vomiting alll kinds of
>blasphemic words, then it is proper to present the Absolute Truth and even
>criticize the imperfect paths 

Yes, that's why I'm attacking you right now.

-- 
Web (Kundalini-yoga): http://danijel.cjb.net