pada@pon.net wrote:
>Prabhu, the problem is that Sridhara Maharaja and other deviants
...

A quote:
-----
From      : "Devarsi Muni dasa" 
Subject   : PADA speaks from the pits of hell
Message-ID: <7tgjs6$fco$1@oak.prod.itd.earthlink.net>

>And do not do this in ISKCON. Yet when we asked Vipramukhya why he was
>making GBC into gurus worshipped like Srila Prabhupada in 1978 he
>said:
>
>BECAUSE WE WERE TOLD TO DO SO BY SRIDHARA MAHAHARAJA,

If anyone said such a thing, it  may be becasuse of this instruction
from Srila Prabhupada:

"For spiritual advancement of life, we must go to one who is actually
practicing spiritual life; not to some head of a mundane institution,
not to one who has offended his Spiritual Master in so many ways. I do
not wish to go into all details here, but I must inform you that this
Bon Maharaja may be considered as a black snake, and at the time of
His Disappearance, my Guru Maharaja did not even wish to have him in
His presence due to the character of this Bon Maharaja. So if you are
actually serious to take instructions from a siksa guru, I can refer
you to one who is most highly competent of all my god-brothers. This
is B.R. Sridhara Maharaja, whom I consider to be even my siksa guru,
so what to speak of the benefit that you can have from his
association."
-----

Now let me see: a person to whom Prabhupada refers to as his siksa
guru is now a deviant? Your guru's siksa guru, the most competent of
his godbrothers, is a deviant who endorses the pedophiles? Can't you
see a little problem in your system, like, that you've gone so far
that you are spitting all over everything that has any association
whatsoever with Prabhupada? 
Or is "deviant pedophile" a term you use instead of "God's servant"?
Maybe we can make a PADA-adjusted dictionary of vaisnava terminology,
where other terms would be adequatly translated?

-- 
Web (Kundalini-yoga): http://danijel.cjb.net