"CS" <@mdo.net> wrote:
>>It some cases it might be best to suspend judgement, but it is ludicrous to
>>have to suspend judgement in all cases of contradiction.
>
>Since you have rejected Srila Prabhupada in favor of someone who was highly
>critical of Sarasvati Thakura, without doubt, you are asat sanga, and your
>intelligence is polluted.  It would be ludicrous for anyone to suspend that
>judgment.

Well, I for instance don't share that opinion. Nobody is beyond
criticism, and at some occasions criticism can be the very thing that
can save someone from making irreversible mistakes. Since Sarasvati
Thakura's lineage resulted in two very problematic organizations
(Gaudiya Math and ISKCON), it would be a serious mistake not to
inspect the background of those failures.

>>My objective is not to denounce Prabhupada or to find fault with him. My
>>point is to recuperate the use of intelligence, which you seem to insist is
>>optional.
>
>asat sanga tyag, ei vaisnava acar: that is also intelligence.  If your
>objective was not to denounce Srila Prabhupada, why had you taken shelter of
>someone who was denouncing Sarasvati Thakura?

He was probably avoiding asat sanga, the bad company. :))

>>My point is not to find fault with Prabhupada, but to make you aware that
>>there are situations where you have to make up your mind whether Prabhupada
>>was or was not right.
>
>Like right now.  Srila Prabhupada is a pure devotee, whose words and actions
>are dictated by the supersoul.  Therefore, Srila Prabhupada, even if he
>seems to be wrong, is right.

:)))) ROTFL :))))
The big mistake with that theory is that "Prabhupada" simply wasn't on
that spiritual level. He was a person who functioned on the astral
plane with the peaks in the mental plane, and who tried to speak of
much higher levels, far beyond his limited experience. He was
therefore mostly wrong, but he sometimes managed to make a valid
point. 

>You, dear sir, are a rascal.

And you, sir, are rude and abusive.

-- 
Web (Kundalini-yoga): http://danijel.cjb.net