X-Ftn-To: Larry Kulp 

"Larry Kulp"  wrote:
>But it does point out an epistemological axiom.  The question, "Why?" always
>leads to an ultimate, unanswerable "Is."  Otherwise, the question plunges
>one into an infinite regression.  "God" is not necessarily the final answer,
>because one can always ask, "Why does God exist?"  

This can happen only if you have a bad definition of God. However, if
you define God as the uncaused cause of all, or, more accurately, as
the origin of the causal chain, then the question "why does God exist"
represents a logical fallacy, because it implies cause of the
uncaused.

-- 
Homepage: http://www.danijel.org