X-Ftn-To: alesclandre 

alesclandre@yahoo.com (alesclandre) wrote:
>Yeah, well, it is not because you had a bad argument with that person
>that you must play the shrink and destabilize her even more.
>The question was: how do you see her "astral body", not what you see.
>I am interested in this too.

That's a rather obsolete question, because I'm a teacher of yoga. Of
course I can see that. A better question would be, how is it possible
that so many of you pose as some sort of authorities, and you're
actually surprized with the fact that somebody can actually do
something, instead of just giving aerobics classes. 

>And by the way, no need for that kind of perception, anybody reading her posts
>can say such things, except you exaggerate a lot. I could say the same
>things about you, you could say the same thing about me.

You can say anything about me, but you will be wrong. I, however, will
be right.

>For a reason unknown to me, you were at once hostile to her. Why? 

Why not?

>I do not see "astral body", but i read your posts too, Danijel :-)

It's not enough.

>Anybody on this newsgroup who has been there for a long time knows who you
>are. So stop trying to impress people.

Actually, I have to maintain an extremely understated image of myself,
in order for folks like you not to get ego-fits, and even _that_ seems
to be too much for you. 

>I thought you had amended your ways, not so apparently.

You totally missed it.

-- 
Homepage: http://www.danijel.org