X-Ftn-To: George Hammond 

George Hammond  wrote:
>It's not quite that simple.  If it was, it wouldn't have taken 4,000
>years to figure it out.
>  Fact is, there is first of all a Genetic difference between
>people, and second of all, a Growth difference between people.
>this is commonly referred to as NATURE and NURTURE... perhaps
>you've heard it mentioned even out in Croatia.
>  The "growth curve deficit" is simply another name for NURTURE.
>Ok, so Stephen Hawkings has Hi-Nature (genetics/class) and
>Lo-Nurture (development).  This is true of all geniuses in general.
>on the other hand, Mike Tyson has Hi-Nurture and Lo-Nature, which
>is true of all Boxers in general (Lo-Class, Hi-Development).  In fact,
>as a general rule, the Higher the Class, the Lower the Development,
>and the Lower the Class, the higher the Development... NATURE and
>NURTURE offset each other, and THIS is what causes "ALL MEN TO
>BE EQUAL", in case you never figured it out. 

muscle*brain = const., it seems.
This says that intellectual and physical development seem to be
reverse rather than directly proportional values, which kisses your
theory bye-bye. You really do have a talent for putting a foot in your
mouth. ;) Where is your Bully God now, eh? 

BTW, by we now we had two physicists with degrees, and myself, an
ex-wannabe physicist without a degree, tell you more-less the same
thing about your theories. Why don't you start printing them on toilet
paper and put them to good use, for a change?

-- 
Homepage: http://www.danijel.org