X-Ftn-To: George Hammond 

George Hammond  wrote:
>WRONG, SHEAR TAUTOLOGICAL NONSENSE ON YOUR PART, probably because
>you have no scientific credentials.

True, I have no official scientific credentials. But, since you used
this several times as your main argument, this probably means that you
have exhausted all your arguments and that you admit to be wrong.
After all, I don't mind using ad hominem as a conclusion - if
something behaves like an idiot, then call it an idiot, by all means.
But, you can't use it to replace the arguments, i.e. "you don't have
any scientific credentials, which means that your objections are
invalid". This is a known logical fallacy. 

>the SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD, is just that, SCIENTIFIC and
>has NOTHING to do with "philosophy"... pleqse do not bore us with
>any more of you "philosophy tripe".

So, go ahead and explain why a degree in scientific disciplines is
called PhD, or, "philosophiae doctor". And, you could also explain why
physics is academically known as "philosophia naturalis". You must
have found something about this in the LoC that you read. :) I,
however, am supposed to be academically ignorant, so teach me. :)

-- 
Homepage: http://www.danijel.org