Nino Krvavica wrote:
>> Staljin je uzivao u gulazima, u smaknucima svojih neprijatelja, zato sto 
>> je bio bolestan. Sefovi konc logora isto tako, egzekutori takodjer. 
>> Cijeli taj lanac je psihopatoloski i nema tu nista neosobno i hladno. 
>>
>> Branis neobranjivo, jer nema hladne masinerije, sve je to nabijeno 
>> emocijama i zivi zvjerinjak koji uziva u mukama.
>>
> 
> Nikako se ne slažem.

I to s punim pravom. Lik radi s karikaturom, s materijalom kojeg
propagandna mašinerija servira budalama. Problem s koncentracionim
logorima je bio upravo u tome što management logora nisu sačinjavali
krvožedni luđaci nego mirni staloženi administratori čije nasmijane
slike sa zajedničkih izleta predstavljaju najbizarnije izloške u muzeju
holokausta. Pazi ovo:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adolf_Eichmann

"In 'Eichmann in Jerusalem', a book formed by this reporting, Arendt
concluded that, aside from a desire for improving his career, Eichmann
showed no trace of an antisemitic personality or of any psychological
damage to his character. She called him the embodiment of the "Banality
of Evil", as he appeared at his trial to have an ordinary and common
personality, displaying neither guilt nor hatred. She suggested that
this most strikingly discredits the idea that the Nazi criminals were
manifestly psychopathic and different from ordinary people."

-- 
http://www.danijel.org/