X-Ftn-To: d'geezer@d'geezer.net 

d'geezer@d'geezer.net wrote:
>>Why not 5) An armed guard at the school gates, otherwise quite
>>inconspicuous, but ready to jump in on the first sign of trouble, and
>>who is on the school's payroll?
>
>First person taken out by the nut. 

This we will never know, because the guard was not there.

>>>Why does maintaining schools as attractive, conveniently located,
>>>gift-wrapped boxes of victims seem to be such a good idea to you? 
>>
>>Why do you think that putting words in my mouth is a good idea?
>
>Why do you not answer? 

Answer what? You said that I said something that I didn't say, and now
I should answer that?

>Tell me, do you believe that some of the adminstrators or
>staff at that school should have had guns?

No, absolutely not. But, the idea about an armed guard seems good. 

-- 
Homepage: http://www.danijel.org