X-Ftn-To: Richard Henry 

"Richard Henry"  wrote:
>> >Hammond is a crackpot BTW.
>>
>> Of course he is, I just wanted to see if he's able to identify the
>> mistakes in his theory when they are clearly pointed out. He's not,
>> which makes me think that he gets fuel for his ego through the idea
>> that he's the one to make a hystorical breakthrough in the history of
>> religion and science. :) It's not likely that he'll accept that his
>> theory is worthless.
>
>Of course not.  That's why he is a crackpot.

It seems that every place on the globe has several of the kind; in
Croatia, we have one guy who keeps stalking the maths professors at
the university in Zagreb and tries to tell them that he managed to
calculate the pi to the last decimal. He keeps complaining that they
are all narrow-minded and dogmatic. 
There's another guy who claims that he's invented antigravity and can
make a flying saucer, he just needs a couple of millions of dollars in
order to make a prototype. Every now and then there's a guy who
invents a perpetuum mobile. Oh well. :)

-- 
Homepage: http://www.danijel.org