If you look at my old books and other writing, it\u2019s obvious that I was under several serious misapprehensions. I also didn\u2019t understand all of it correctly. How is it, then, that I was not harmed by those misapprehensions \u2013 like, at all? And how is it that my former students could never be justified in disobeying me?<\/p>\n
Some of the misapprehensions look quite serious \u2013 I thought Sanat Kumar was the Purusha of the Earth, basically the aspect of God dedicated to spiritual evolution in this place. This sounds very much like thinking Satan is in fact God. Which I did. I also thought his plan of evolving people to higher initiation was good. So, I basically said \u201cexcellent plan, let me help you with that\u201d, and I assisted people in evolving to attain higher initiation.<\/p>\n
Yes, I thought he was God. So I focused on God, saw what is the right thing to do, and did it. I suspect Satan was not at all happy with how that went, but basically, you can\u2019t deceive someone who already has a connection to God. You either pretend you\u2019re God well enough to pass, in which case you can\u2019t effectively do anything harmful, or you try to deceive and you are ignored because it\u2019s not of God. He tried deceiving me both personally and through his sock puppet of Sai Baba, and he used all kinds of sophisticated deceptions, the stuff that would make your skin crawl, on the limits of nirvikalpa samadhi<\/i>. When I was deceived, it was because deceptions were very good. However, nothing sticks. I went to India, saw that Sai Baba doesn\u2019t have the mantric signature of God, and used the mantric signature of God to break down his playground. Deceiving me works about as well for Satan as catching a big hornet works for a small spider. Successfully caught hornet in net. Net broken.<\/p>\n
So, whatever I did then, it had the mantric signature of God and led to God. When I was under some misapprehension, I charged it with the mantric signature of God. The \u201cguys up there\u201d were not allowed to reveal the truth about Sanat Kumar; I had to figure it out myself first before they could confirm it. They could, however, show me enough of the real stuff for his deceptions to fail. I also didn\u2019t know how exactly and why the Kundalini techniques I used work. I knew that they do. The entire theory was gradually revealed decades later. I didn\u2019t have to change a single thing about the techniques, because those were revealed in perfect form very early on, before I started working with students. That\u2019s why nobody is justified in renouncing me by citing my mistakes and misapprehensions. It all had the mantric signature of God. The technical system works. The theoretical understanding came later, but that\u2019s the least important part, and one can attain higher initiation without it, obviously.<\/p>\n
That\u2019s why I left my old books as they are, without revising them. It\u2019s a historic record of how things were revealed to me and how my understanding evolved. To say it was all there at once would be wrong, and it would misrepresent the process. It also shows that it doesn\u2019t matter if all is not revealed at once, because what is revealed early is what is needed to reach the point where you get more. Reject that, and you rejected God. That\u2019s how it is. Also, God did this as a test. I was deliberately imperfect, flawed and weakened, so that there would be a possibility of failure to correctly identify me and act accordingly. I also don\u2019t think Satan would allow something that is completely unambiguous to manifest in his world \u2013 there always must be room for doubt, so that he could have something to work with.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
If you look at my old books and other writing, it\u2019s obvious that I was under several serious misapprehensions. I also didn\u2019t understand all of it correctly. How is it, then, that I was not harmed by those misapprehensions \u2013 … Continue reading