When I mostly wrote about politics for a few years, some people understood it as me \u201cnot being interested in spirituality any more\u201d. When I started writing about spirituality again, shocked Pikachu face, I guess. So, what\u2019s the deal?<\/p>\n
Well, it\u2019s kind of obvious. When I saw Western propaganda accompanying the Olympics in Sochi, Russia, I understood that such propaganda is something that would happen only if they had a long-term plan for a war with Russia. As I analysed the events from this perspective, it gave me such a good match that I started a political blog as a place where I can unload my thought processes as a form of a warning, because there\u2019s no way for a war between West and Russia not to eventually go nuclear, and people should know about that well in advance in order to be able to prepare, and by prepare I mean be ready to absorb lesser impacts before the major one, and when the major one comes, be on good terms with God.<\/p>\n
What do I mean by lesser impacts? Well, if you\u2019re in Ukraine, you got to find out already. Likewise if you\u2019re in Israel, or the region around Iran. It\u2019s not particularly great in some parts of the West either; London, Paris etc. have turned into terrible shitholes that resemble Africa. America is also not a great place to be, and it\u2019s getting worse.<\/p>\n
I expected that, because the nuclear ultimate escalation isn\u2019t something that just happens out of nowhere. You don\u2019t attack Russia and China because you\u2019re doing well. You\u2019re doing it because your civilisation is at an impasse, and you\u2019re looking for a desperate way out. Others react to your desperate measures in progressively more desperate ways, and it ends in mushroom clouds.<\/p>\n
People have a silly idea about nuclear war \u2013 basically, both sides push a button and twenty minutes later there\u2019s no world. I wanted to explain why this isn\u2019t so, and why they will try everything else first, and why most people in the world won\u2019t even know there was a nuclear war until much later. You need to understand the logic of those things.<\/p>\n
So yeah, that was a priority. Also, the reason why I didn\u2019t write about \u201cspirituality\u201d \u2013 God, I hate that word \u2013 is because I was thinking and meditating and figuring things out, and I don\u2019t like talking just to hear myself talk. I basically needed a decade or two of processing to do, in order to get to the next level of understanding, and it\u2019s not something you can copy-paste from somewhere, because, simply put, nobody has ever done it before. I did write bits and pieces as I was sure, and eventually \u201cThe Light Beyond<\/a>\u201d happened, as a culmination of all this. One of the more important reasons why I didn\u2019t write much is because people who read it generate their own ideas that feed back into my perception, and then it makes it harder for me to figure things out and get a clear signal through all the interference. Then, as I got the pieces together, I could write it all down, since feedback loops no longer matter once I get it.<\/p>\n There\u2019s another silly thing I found out recently; you see, I sensed that people ask Chat GPT and other LLM AI models about me. I asked Romana to try asking the questions I felt people are asking, and indeed, the answers came immediately, which means the system already had everything cached from recent inquiries. She copy-pasted some of it to me, and I found it incredibly silly. For instance, when you ask AI how competent I am, basically asking it to evaluate me because you trust a statistical evaluator of other people\u2019s opinions more than you trust your own judgment, it tells you, essentially, that I\u2019m quite competent at photography and programming, and less so at politics and religious philosophy \u2013 essentially, evaluating my deviation from the data pool that defines its primary neural networks as \u201cbeing wrong\u201d, while matches with consensus opinion are interpreted as \u201cbeing right\u201d. People who don\u2019t know how that shitbox \u201cthinks\u201d will mistake it for actually having thought processes, which it doesn\u2019t. The true interpretation of what it said is that my IT knowledge is generic enough that every competent IT person shares it, my photography knowledge is essentially what every competent photographer shares, and my pictures are composed along the lines of what is generally found aesthetically pleasing. My political opinions, however, are completely out of, what its western and leftist data pool of generally accepted propaganda defined by the CIA, defines as \u201cnormal\u201d, so it\u2019s \u201cwrong\u201d and \u201cnot substantiated by facts\u201d, where facts are what the CIA tells the \u201cjournalists\u201d to publish. Also, my opinions about spirituality are not the generally found copy-pasta; it\u2019s actually the real thing, because I have my own independent access to the facts, which is orders of magnitude better than anyone else\u2019s. In fact, some of the facts I have are my own memories from long ago, which are accessible only to me, and nobody else (with the exception of a few who also happened to be there); in simple terms, nobody else knows what actually happened because they weren\u2019t there as it happened. I was. If someone didn\u2019t learn it from me, they don\u2019t know. So, Chat GPT thinks I\u2019m taking myself too seriously, because it can\u2019t verify my sources, so it thinks they are questionable. They are not.<\/p>\n Let me put it this way. Only a few people have been on the Moon. A few more have been in orbit around it. They have a unique perspective on it, and others are not really in a position where they can verify it independently. If they tell Neil Armstrong that he shouldn\u2019t take himself too seriously with his stories about walking on the Moon, my answer is that they, in fact, are the ones who are taking themselves too seriously and they shouldn\u2019t, while he\u2019s taking himself exactly as seriously as he should, as he has an independent source of experience that they can\u2019t access, duplicate or independently verify, so they should shut the fuck up.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" When I mostly wrote about politics for a few years, some people understood it as me \u201cnot being interested in spirituality any more\u201d. When I started writing about spirituality again, shocked Pikachu face, I guess. So, what\u2019s the deal? Well, … Continue reading