{"id":5764,"date":"2026-06-08T21:24:07","date_gmt":"2026-06-08T20:24:07","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.danijel.org\/blog\/?p=5764"},"modified":"2026-06-08T21:29:17","modified_gmt":"2026-06-08T20:29:17","slug":"god-has-a-say","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.danijel.org\/blog\/god-has-a-say\/","title":{"rendered":"God has a say"},"content":{"rendered":"<p align=\"justify\">I can tell exactly when the New Age concept of religion started.<\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\">It was September 11, 1893, in Chicago. There, Swami Vivekananda held a speech at the \u201cWorld\u2019s Parliament of Religions\u201d, essentially sucking up to everyone by saying they\u2019re all good: all religions lead to God, like rivers that all lead to the same ocean. Which is kind of obvious, considering how many people from all kinds of religions have reached God.<\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\">Yes, that was sarcasm, and the applause from appealing to all that narcissism must have been something to see.<\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\">God can truly adopt whichever form is most effective for leading the worshipper. Sometimes, it means that if you pray to God through a certain religion, God will reveal Himself to you in that form. However, sometimes it means God will reveal Himself in the form that actually teaches you and leads you from a wrong path to the correct one. I\u2019ve heard of Muslims having visions of Jesus and converting to Christianity, or having NDE visions where they saw that Islam is completely wrong and Christ is the Lord, again, converting to Christianity when they were revived. That doesn\u2019t look very much like \u201call religions are equally good\u201d, or \u201cGod will reveal Himself in whichever form you pray to\u201d. No: God is the Truth, and He will lead you to Himself. Your starting point can be whatever \u2013 it\u2019s obvious that most are terrible. However, God can meet you in your pit of spiritual doom and show you the way out. That doesn\u2019t mean you will see Allah if you\u2019re a Muslim. It means you will see the way to God from your bad place.<\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\">I\u2019ve heard about Protestant Christians who had a vision of Mary, mother of Christ, because that was the aspect of God they deliberately neglected and looked down upon, and that was the vision God chose as their next step and a way out of their spiritual darkness. It\u2019s something you need, and don\u2019t have.<\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\">People think what Vivekananda, and later Sai Baba taught: that you can imagine God in whichever form and God will reveal Himself to you, means that you can do whatever \u2013 imagine God in form of a sexy girl, for instance, and visualise some \u201c<i>tantra<\/i>\u201d. In Hindu tradition, this would be known as \u201c<i>aparadha<\/i>\u201d, translated as either \u201coffence\u201d or \u201ctransgression\u201d, and means something that either ends your spiritual path altogether, or gets you a vacation in some picturesque section of hell. There are rules for this, you know. A form in which you can visualise God can be very few things, and always something that is the strongest association with God in your soul. It can\u2019t be a bottle of Coca Cola, or a centrefold from Playboy, or anything that\u2019s not actually God. Also, it can\u2019t be anything that God personally wouldn\u2019t approve of, because, believe it or not, God does actually have a say in this. If God doesn\u2019t approve of your conduct, your spiritual path will either be thorny or lead through Shit Creek. When I followed this instruction from Sai Baba, that God will answer in whichever form was closest to us, I thought about it, and meditated on Jesus. Why, because He was the default association with God in any kind of form, and I visualised Him in the sermon on the Mount, in His moment of power and glory. That was obviously a good choice, because I received initiation immediately thereafter.<\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\">So no, you can\u2019t just \u201cdo whatever\u201d and hope to have good outcomes, because God has a say. God needs to approve of your consciousness, conduct and choices. You need to impress God with your actions, for instance by manifesting sincerity, purity and choice for transcendence and away from the worldly. Sure, God can sometimes show Himself to people who are on a very wrong path in order to snap them out of it, but I would not count on that being some kind of a rule. It is much better to do things that are recommended, and meditating on an incarnation of God, rather than some form that you \u201clike\u201d, is a good start. If you want to reach God, meditating on a person of God is the way to go. Trying to avoid meditating on the known person of God and instead visualising some other form translates into trying to avoid God because you have some issues with Him. Better get those sorted out first, methinks.<\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\">As for religions, have in mind that not all rivers lead to the sea. Some lead to deserts where they evaporate. Some lead into desolate, isolated lakes that serve as radioactive waste dumps. Some religions, in fact, don\u2019t lead to God, are not created by God, and don\u2019t have anything to do with God. Some have a transcendental component, but also contain serious errors. You can\u2019t rest assured that whichever religion you are born in or have chosen for yourself, your eventual fate will be in God. Most likely, you will have to change your religion at least once if not many times, and at some point you will actually need to have thoughts of your own because no religion will suffice.<\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\">If you actually read more of Vivekananda, you will see that his actual opinion on this is far from \u201cany religion will do\u201d. In fact, he thinks that various religions are good for people on that particular level of spiritual evolution. The idea that anything will lead you from the beginning to the end is naive. In the beginning, sophisticated ideas will be too much for you. Near the end, no idea will likely encompass your understanding properly, because it will simply be too vast. Also, of course, Vivekananda held a reductionist view of religion, where <i>advaita vedanta<\/i> is the real truth, and everything else is a lesser knowledge that might be necessary along the path, but will later be discarded for a more superior knowledge, culminating, of course, in what he personally believed. \ud83d\ude42<\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\">In the end, always remember: God isn\u2019t some impersonal energy you can focus and manipulate. God might not be a person the way you are a person, but only because He\u2019s much, much more of a person than you are. Where your level of personality is like a mass-value of a rock, God\u2019s level of personality is like a mass-value of a galactic supermassive black hole. God is much, much more of a person than you are, and not just one; and He has opinions, He has a say in things, and He will make a judgment on you. Doing \u201cwhatever\u201d will end \u201cwherever\u201d. Doing your best to find God by focusing on the best possible idea you have of God, is likely to get God\u2019s attention. But that\u2019s not a magical recipe for invoking God, because, remember: God is a person, and He has opinions, feelings and judgments. He has the final say.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I can tell exactly when the New Age concept of religion started. It was September 11, 1893, in Chicago. There, Swami Vivekananda held a speech at the \u201cWorld\u2019s Parliament of Religions\u201d, essentially sucking up to everyone by saying they\u2019re all &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.danijel.org\/blog\/god-has-a-say\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-5764","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-religion"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.danijel.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5764","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.danijel.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.danijel.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.danijel.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.danijel.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5764"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/www.danijel.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5764\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5768,"href":"https:\/\/www.danijel.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5764\/revisions\/5768"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.danijel.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5764"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.danijel.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5764"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.danijel.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5764"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}