I once mentioned that I’m not an egalitarian, but you would probably assume wrong if you tried to guess the rationale behind this. You see, I’ve seen more diversity in souls, human or otherwise, than you could possibly imagine. Especially, I’ve seen diversity in souls that inhabit a similar body type; for instance, in a “young European woman” body type I’ve seen everything from completely generic, unformed low-astral structures, in great variety of structures and shapes, high-astral (some would call them mental) very sophisticated structures sometimes bordering on outright vajra initiation, and outright Gods on the extreme end – structures that use vajras, not only blue but even higher, as “ornaments”, while the spiritual body itself is of much higher quality, which you can’t imagine before having actually seen it. Also, within the spectrum of very similar body types I’ve seen huge variety in intelligence, from “stupid as fuck”, to “genius”, and in character, from “Satan’s asshole” to “aspect of God”. You can’t be an egalitarian if you’ve seen all this. Also, I’ve seen huge differences in typical soul-types between India and Europe. Obviously, incarnation is not a random thing. You don’t just randomly incarnate somewhere. This doesn’t mean that soul-type strictly follows a racial or a cultural group, but I did notice strong patterns. For instance, after getting used to the soul-types prevalent in India, I was shocked at the much greater sophistication and complexity of the ordinary Italians in the airport in Rome.
You would expect that the ability to see this would be exciting or entertaining. I assure you, for the most part it’s the exact opposite, because the statistical distribution of soul-types seems to follow a Gaussian pattern, which means that most of what I see is a very simplistic, coarse type that doesn’t differ greatly from the soul-types I saw in animals. In very rare cases you see something that’s not actually animalistic, demonic or disgusting. As you can imagine, observing all this, all the time, gave me my wonderful optimism regarding human nature. 🙂 Seeing the same energy-structure in a man and in a dog makes it quite impossible for me to see humans in general as my equals; if anything, I define my equal in terms of a soul-type, not a body-type.
Danijel, have you ever met individuals who had very complex soul structure that would usually make them aspect of God but are in fact piece of shit scum humans?
I know that you mentioned “Also, within the spectrum of very similar body types I’ve seen huge variety in intelligence, from “stupid as fuck”, to “genius”, and in character, from “Satan’s asshole” to “aspect of God”.”, but I am not sure do you by “Satan’s asshole” regard just evil man/woman with low complexity structure or you can be experienced and big soul individual that is incarnation of evil.
Evil people are mostly also spiritually very rudimentary. However, I did see examples of sophisticated soul-structures behind evil people. Unfortunately. In all cases, the souls had some sort of a pact with Sanat Kumar, and I’m not sure how independently I should view them. A good example was Sai Baba. He’s the most contradictory entity I’ve ever seen, because he appeared to function as two different entities in incarnate and discarnate forms. If you talked to him in his discarnate form, his ability as a mage was extreme. However, he was below vajra-initiation. He was able to communicate with my wife in symbolic astral language, and at one point before his death he made a wide-spectrum astral broadcast that I, among probably several intended recipients, received. In the physical form, however, he was almost a different person, of much lower competence and power, but at the same time I saw intense laser-beam-like blue light scanning throughout his audience during darshan in Puttaparthi, I’m not really sure he had even a fraction of it at the conscious level, and he seemed to be more of a victim and a prisoner than a person in a position of power and authority, and I found it quite shocking when I saw him physically, saw the way he does things, and understood that he’s actually much weaker than I am, when I at the time thought of him as my teacher (one can imagine how I might have ben carefully guided to that conclusion by Sanat Kumar, though). He looked exactly like I would expect one to look if he sold his soul to Satan. Also, I completely believe the stories about his pedophilia and faggotry; I heard too many stories, and it looks like he made a few compromises too many and his astral field was completely crushed by his “students”, and he simply manifested typical sexually-repressed shit from their astral. So yes, very weird shit exists, and that includes humans with hugely complex soul-structure, huge magical powers and skill, who are also weaklings who made all sorts of bad compromises for power and fame, made a deal with Satan, lost everything that made them relevant, and are reduced to the lowest octave of human behaviour.
But I should make one thing clear here: as sophisticated as those beings may be spiritually, every single one of them is below vajra-initiation level, and even vajra-initiation is far, far below the level I would consider an aspect of God. Also, when I say that Sai Baba could skilfully communicate over the astral, I must also note that the actual Gods that I talked to are so incredibly better than he is, it isn’t even funny. He’s good for a human. However, it’s all lacking an entire spectrum of super sophisticated stuff that I experienced from the actually highly initiated beings. The difference is akin to that between “I Tarzan, you Jane” idiot-talk, and a someone who answers the questions I didn’t know I had, in a way that responds to the deepest level of sophistication. Also, with Sai Baba I always had the same feeling as with Sanat Kumar, that he’s cold-reading me, while with the Gods I always felt as if they know me better than I know myself. Completely different order of magnitude. However, the ordinary humans, even those who claim to have dabbled in magic of some kind, are far, far below Sai Baba’s level. He was dangerously skilled, but I physically met people who spiritually exceed his level so much it isn’t even funny.
Furthermore, I was thinking how there seems to be a pretty wide range of possibilities in the spectrum between “muggle” and “God”. However, the wide variety of cults proves that ordinary unskilled humans aren’t very good at telling shit apart, and a mediocre mage who talks about Vedanta can pass for an avatar. Also, on the other end of the spectrum, a God with a huge competence-set can be mistaken for a low-end entity, simply because people are too fucking stupid to know the difference.
What do you think it was purpose of Sai Baba? Was he specifically incarnated on Earth in this time to produce some specific effect?
Didn’t hear stories about him being a pedophile, first word of it, interesting…
I don’t know what *his* purpose specifically was. I didn’t get an impression that he’s all that special a phenomenon, but he and his kind probably had the purpose of being a decoy that was intended for attracting genuine seekers of God and diverting them from the real thing. That at least is what the results look like in Puttaparthi. It looks like falsehood that was designed to trap the generic, non-powerful humans who wanted God but had no genuine wisdom, and I see the entire thing as merely one of the traps that are abundant here. Everything I saw in Puttaparthi looked like an imitation of spirituality in various aspects
That is messed up, but it seems logical when you know who created all this shit. I mean why wouldn’t there be “agents” of SK, makes complete sense.
I’m not sure about the word “agents”, because it implies agency, the ability to make informed decisions based on free will. In their case, they look more like that woman in Austria who was locked up and fucked by her father all her life, and grew up to be a pretty deformed individual. Also, their fate is grim, and yet they look like they would never choose another way, yet it is inconceivable how anyone would voluntarily choose to walk a path with such a dark ending. It’s as if they are coerced into submission to Satan by their very nature. It’s really fucked up shit. But on the other hand, all of them would look at me and think I chose everything wrong, because I turned away from the “real spirituality” and “real God”, which is you-know-who.
Isn’t this ironic for people who made the most sophisticated holy scriptures in the history of humankind?
What happened to India and why?
I was actually selling some exotic computer equipment in the last few months and although the level of technological development is not the only criteria on which you can base your judgement about different parts of the world, I did my own little internal map, even if my sampling pool is just way too small to make any real judgements.
But anyway, it looks something like this:
The first place would be certainly occupied by the US since more than half of my buyers came from there, but this probably has to do something with the fact that most of the IT industry is stationed there also (i.e. I’ve had a handful of people contacting me directly from Microsoft)
Second place would be EU, especially Germany, and also England to some extent. I would put Australia here too.
Third place is shared by Russia, Japan, Singapore and maybe Israel.
Outside of those mentioned countries, I’ve had no one, like the rest of the world simply doesn’t exist.
There are some peculiarities, however. For example, in the group 2, I’ve had some countries I wouldn’t really expect to be there, like Greece, Croatia and Romania.
But not a single buyer from India, and not a single buyer from China, which is an astounding fact, given the sheer size of those countries and their population.
So I asked my friend who’s, among other things, doing peer reviews for PhD applications in the field of computer sciences — what does he think about India. He told me most of the papers coming from there are utter shit, he’s yet to see something interesting coming from India. Go figure.
First of all, those two articles were written somewhere at 2 AM, because I wanted to write down several lines of thought before going away for 10 days; I’m trying to recharge batteries, because winter.
Second, the Indians. You ask what happened to them. Islam happened. The Muslims overran them, destroyed their culture and killed everybody who wasn’t both submissive and had religious beliefs compatible enough with Islam. The Vedic culture, which was already in a serious crisis in the early days of Buddhism, was completely wiped out. Buddhism was completely wiped out. What happened next is what is now known as “Hinduism”, when Shankaracharya for instance invented a worldview which was abstract enough to avoid both the Islamic hatred of idolatry and its hatred of atheism. The sexual culture that gave birth to Kama sutra and tantra was wiped out, replaced with a dress code and mental framework that was more compatible with Islam. You see, under Islam, you are not necessarily forced to convert, you just don’t have freedom to do anything the Muslims happen not to like. It’s exact this kind of spiritual slavery and subservience to evil that will happen to Europe if things progress linearly from where we are now, and it’s one of the reasons why I hate Islam so fucking much. It’s a spiritual virus that turns everything into shit.
Some people think that the British fucked India up, but that’s completely false. The British contributions were almost entirely positive (by “almost” I mean draining India of resources) – they introduced schools, railroads, unified language and law, and their contributions are more-less the foundation for all that’s good in today’s India. Also, they wiped out the most harmful things – human sacrifice, Thuggee murder cult etc. The British colonialism produced universally good results, while the Islamic conquest produced universally bad results.
Third, it’s interesting that China isn’t on your map, but it is true that China’s development might be overstated. In China you have everything from the most advanced stuff to the most primitive stuff, depending on the region. I too had experiences with them using staggeringly primitive solutions in the payment industry, so it’s definitely not all on the level of the Huawei P10 smartphone.
No Vatican on the list? 🙂
I would be really surprised if you saw mainland Chinese on the Internet outside of their own cyberspace for a number of reasons. And I would be also surprised if you ran into a lot of people from France. Their cyberspace is rich and no one there speaks English other than few people who spent time abroad in Canada or UK.
My list is slightly different than yours:
I’d put Europe, Australia, and Russia at the top. I would exclude Romanians from this group because the “gypsies” (by which I also mean Romanians who act like them) drop the average quite a bit. I would also exclude Serbs not because I’m a Croat but because of their attitude/mentality that is ever the same.
The US I’d put in second tier at best. I’m aware there are some great people there but to me the cultural level (on average) is very noticeably below that of the EU. Compared to Americans the Europeans act like gentlemen and English lords.
Can’t say anything positive about Indians. I’ve had better experience with black Europeans who so far have impressed me with their behavior, but then again they were upper class so I don’t know what the average would be.
The absolutely worst people I’ve ever seen are these “migrants”. I feel dirty just by passing near them and if I could I’d launch them with catapult over the border, literary. I say “migrants” and not Muslims because so far my automatic reaction to normal Muslims was treating them politely as long as they treat me the same.
As for the Chinese, I see mainland Chinese as too materialistic and traditional for my taste. But I see that mostly as a result of recent poverty, communism and “cultural devolution”. The Chinese in Hong Kong, Taiwan, and Southeast Asia seem more European-like.