Yesterday I heard that Jordan Peterson is severely ill again, and his daughter thinks a significant portion of that might be a spiritual attack, as she called it. I also heard that Dennis Prager broke his neck in November 2024 and was left quadriplegic. You all know what happened to Charlie Kirk and Gonzalo Lira.
Everybody associated with me has been under extreme astral pressure for years already. I’m not sure it’s a single-source issue; a part of it might be acceptance of spending karmic consequences with the intended goal of spiritual growth while this is still possible, ie. before this world ends. The acceptance seems to be given on soul-level and one might not even be aware of it on a conscious level. The next possible cause are the various “scripts”, essentially Satan’s “minions”, his standing orders within the system that maintains this world, that are brutally pressure-testing anyone on the right side of salvation, as Christians would put it. Basically, anyone whose choices mark him as loyal to God will get fucked here.
The third source of the problems is the condition of the global astral field, which is terrible for multiple reasons. One of those reasons is the Internet, which amplifies ideas and brings huge masses of people into coherence on all kinds of evil vectors. Among other things, this means that astral attacks by huge masses of unskilled but willing dumbasses upon any good person that showed integrity, principles and virtue, are a common occurrence, especially if the good person is known widely enough. The second aspect of the problem is the lack of spiritual energy in the global system, of which I already talked before, and due to which the whole thing behaves like a decaying tulpa, and humans who were just rubber-stamped without actually having proper souls are behaving like zombies, incapable of any sophisticated emotion, but with plenty of aggression, hatred, violence, defensiveness etc.
All in all, these are terrible times and we need to be ready to accept and endure terrible suffering before the end.
It seems fame has become a bigger curse than ever before, and being known should be avoided, even on the level of (not) using social media. I remember when a few years ago Kathy Griffin got lung cancer (and had one of her lungs removed) after she published that photo with the head. It was a desperate call for attention using shock value, but I guess this is what happens nowadays when people chase fame, whether they are good, bad, smart, dumb… It's an unstable field, and, well said, the internet (+ the old media) is pretty much a conduit for collective hatred: provoking, amplifying, and directing the worst neuroticisms into real-life slasher scenes.
I wonder(ed)… If only one of these negative emotions (say, aggression) would give them enough coherence so they could pursue a useful goal, they might be more bearable, instead of misreacting to the environment all the time. Some 10 years ago I was deceiving myself, thinking, "Oh, maybe I could fix the broken machines (in my immediate environment, family) and try directing them into something productive, since they are practically walking dead." So foolish of me. What could one want to accomplish or improve in a graveyard? And for whom?
I think it would not be unreasonable to say that fame today is essentially deadly. If mechanisms for protecting famous persons from this kind of astral violence existed (as described by Leadbeater and co.) I think they no longer work in these changed conditions; essentially, such a mechanism would have been designed into the system and powered by the same energy sources that are now depleted, and would have been designed for a much lesser volume and magnitude of the problem.
Also, why do I assume that the mechanism was designed into the world system and not implemented from above? Because I was deliberately excluded from those protections, as part of Sanat Kumar's semi-passive murder attempts against me. Basically, he made half the system in ways that require active measures to keep one alive here, so that he can choose to kill someone by simply not actively helping; also, the method was made to be almost completely automatic, where the degree of assistence/retribution by the system was determined by "tokens" one carries, which allowed him both to be excused from all consequences that pertained to specific cases (because he could demonstrate good intention behind the algorithm) and also endless opportunity for abuse of the system (for instance allow one to be deceived out of his rightful token by complex means, after which killing him doesn't require any additional active measures because it would happen in due course of the system merely working as designed). Basically, by default, without a token designating you as a worthwhile individual that contributes value to the system, you are not protected from things that would seriously hurt you, and you are routinely punished by the system for consuming any resources, because the system identifies you as a parasite. The only thing Sanat Kumar had to do in order to have that implemented, was to defend the algorithm according to which taking without contributing is defined as illegal, everybody is assigned a token by default, to which contributions and consumptions are credited, and one can willingly choose to give their token away.
Obviously, it's hard to fault the system if it works properly. However, you are always one deception away from licensing the system to murder you with complete impunity.
Also, I have to add that there's another cop-out designed into the system that can invalidate the protections; essentially, if you do something that can be construed as provocative, and you incur astral "retaliation" for it, you are not seen as an innocent public persona that needs to be defended by the system. It doesn't require much of a leap in logic to construe absolutely any public action as "asking for it", which makes defensive actions by the system completely optional; essentially, it can defend its own agents and un-defend God's agents, since this is very much like the concept of "offensive speech" – any speech worth making will be offensive to someone, so if you're only defended for making completely inoffensive speech, or the system is allowed freedom to decide which offensive speech to arbitrarily choose to defend, you're essentially sentencing yourself to death by speaking in any way Satan doesn't actively like. Also, his hands are clean because he doesn't have to actually kill you, he just has to not actively protect you from attacks, and the attackers will of course commit sin which will bind them to the system and provide more fuel in the future.
So, as long as you are not resonating with the system as a conformist, you'll get attacked. I noticed that even at very low levels of "fame" (that is, being exposed in a leadership position in, say, a firm of 200 people), there is preoccupation with gossip, streams of malice, envy, and resentment (an entire cauldron of toxic astral cooking).
I would assume that one can somewhat protect himself in this game by learning how to perceive and redirect (return) the streams of astral attacks as they occur so as to not suffer the full blow. The agents of the system will, for a while, back down and leave me alone, as they experience the consequences (in some way, they unconsciously acknowledge my position in the hierarchy of strength).
However, this would then make me wonder if I am becoming (at least temporarily) a part (servant, a router) of the system, and it would be silly to assume that I'm not in fact serving the interests of that system by performing a redirection of a poison through another set of pipes. I guess, from what you just wrote, with this approach I'm also adding fuel, but what is the alternative? Suffering from illness and other problems? The moment I sincerely think to myself, "I want to stop this nonsense; I'm done doing this and that," someone appears to apply pressure on me and reminds me of the necessity of making more space for myself to breathe.
I think it's more than that; it needs to identify you as an actual enemy, which means you want God and oppose/reject this world. But it's even wider; it can be that you just got in the way.
So, if you oppose the system, you get attacked. If you don't oppose it, you're already lost. Pick your poison.
It's war then.
How did SK justify not helping someone, but letting them die or actively attacking them, without it looking like a sin against an innocent person? For example, truly creative artists who died in poverty and disease. While he let others reach fame and fortune, and they were either evil or untalented, or both? For example, Van Gogh or Mike Oldfield, who were punished, and I think there is no justification for that.
He doesn't punish you. He just… lets the system default do its thing. Of course, eventually the pattern of his action and inaction becomes obvious and this ultimately ended up as it did, which is to say he did one thing too many, the motivational structure behind the pattern of his actions became obvious and then karma did what it does best.
This was my feeling before the school started, after the holiday break, that we need to brace up for new hardships.
Well, if the enemy is shooting at you, you must be doing something right. 🙂