When I want to find out what America is planning to do, I listen what they are warning people of others wanting to do. For instance, when they warned of Russia going into Ukraine, they were actually amassing troops on the border with Donbass, intending to wipe out its Russian population and potentially going into Russia, to which the Russians responded by amassing troops on their border in return, which was seen as the “proof” of what Americans were “warning” about. It’s easy to be a prophet that way, if you’re actually causing the problem.
Also, Americans were harping about “enemies” attacking critical infrastructure, such as the underwater cables, pipelines and so on, and what did they themselves do? They blew up the Nord Stream pipelines, and who knows what else is in the works.
Now they are warning about Russia using tactical nukes in Ukraine, as if that makes any sense whatsoever, because that’s what a desperately losing side would consider. And then it clicked: of course, they are the desperately losing side. The Russians are preparing an enormous force that will go into Ukraine and be done with its military in short order – no more “special military operation”, this will be an actual war, and Ukraine has barely any military left as it is. Facing with the complete destruction of their puppet, and with potential Russian attacks on their other puppets in Poland and other places, they would detonate a small nuclear weapon (probably something they acquired on the Russian black market in the 1990s, so that they could deny involvement when the isotopes are examined) and then they would have an excuse to strike Russia with something nuclear but limited, thinking it’s a “warning”. Of course, the Russians according to their doctrine respond to this by a full, unlimited nuclear retaliation against America and all its allies. Russia doesn’t have an “escalate to deescalate” doctrine; that’s American invention. Russia has a doctrine of “launch everything if a nuke went off on our territory”.
They are already preparing their population for the nuclear option:
Considering how the Western economies are on the precipice right now, and I am seeing precursors of total economic collapse for several years already, the kind of collapse Soviet Union had in the 1990s, I would take this very seriously, because hiding their own collapse behind a nuclear exchange, which they plan on surviving better than everybody else, is something I’ve been perceiving as an undercurrent of American strategy since 2014.
I’m all for the Rusian cause in this proxy war with America but I’m wondering about how smart is this C19 mandatory vaccination for reservists before they send them to the front …
https://edwardslavsquat.substack.com/p/russia-begins-vaccinating-mobilized
BTW, what do you think if Americans are in a hurry to stir-up the shit before mid-term elections happen and eventually democrats lose the elections, but I guess that wouldn’t change much when it comes to foreign affairs and America’s stance on Russia?!
You mentioned that there is some group in America that is not in the favour of a nuclear war with Russia but I’m not sure who those guys would be and do they have any leverage to change this current course to inevitable disaster?
Yeah, I didn’t like that one either.
Elections don’t change anything because the people who actually rule don’t seem to change. The only thing that seemed to change radically was the introduction of wokeism and all sorts of problematic people in Obama administration, and things went downhill faster since then, but look at the Trump admin – he promised to improve relations with Russia so they falsely accused him of working for Putin, so he introduced all sorts of anti-Russia policies “to prove them wrong”. Even if we don’t go into things this says about his psyche, it’s obvious that the end-result was the same as if they elected an anti-Russia candidate, because any administration can implement only the policies the “deep state” approves, and you can see what those are by what is in the press, because the press and the visible politicians are both controlled by the same men behind the curtain. I know everybody goes crazy every time there are elections in America but I already wrote my analysis years ago – elections don’t do anything there, they are only a show that pacifies the masses by convincing them that they have a say. This, however, changed when Trump “lost” the second election – basically, the “deep state” corrected their mistake from the Hillary election when they didn’t introduce enough fake votes because they thought she had it in the bag. At this point a significant part of the electorate is aware of the fraudulent practices and this increases the likelihood of a civil war.
I think there is a group in the military that tries to avoid things that would inevitably lead to nuclear war, and they occasionally correct all kinds of blunders by Brandon and his cronies, but I’m not sure they are in control. Let’s say not all of America is on board with the nuclear war course, but a significant and very powerful fraction is.