Obviously

Posted on by

I am aware of the fact that I upset some people by very clearly suggesting that most things practiced under the collective umbrella term of spirituality are, in no unclear terms, delusion and fakery, while others are genuine but modest achievements.

Yes; when I was a beginner myself, I thought every person with a spiritual-sounding title and an orange robe is enlightened, everybody talking about spiritual experiences is genuine, every “spiritual book” is genuinely inspired or at least useful, and so on. That was before 1997, when I started experiencing things that were completely unexpected and for which I had no theoretical framework in anything I’ve read or experienced before.

Before, it seemed logical that all the enlightened people are basically saying the same things, in essentially the same terms, and that their experiences confirm what they were taught. It seemed logical – if it’s true, of course it’s confirmed by experience. Since my own experiences confirmed the same things, I considered myself one of them – one of people who experienced the truth.

But as my experiences started to diverge wildly from anything others talked about, I became cautious. It took me a long time to actually change the theoretical framework, because I wanted to be sure it’s true, and that takes time, especially when you’re not copying anyone’s homework.

Now, I am very skeptical of people whose spiritual experiences confirm what they were taught, word by word; the entire dogma. That’s just not how things work when you’re based in reality, like I was. It took me decades to even interpret some experiences properly, that’s how radically they departed from everything I thought I knew.

That answers the next question people have: how come I’m the only one talking about certain things, such as Sanat Kumar, or this world being a weaponised VR, God manifesting as multiple persons, manifestation as a person of God being the goal of personal evolution, and so on? The answer is as simple as it is uncomfortable. No, in fact I’m not the only one talking about those things. There were others before me who figured it out. It’s just that there were so few of us throughout history. All the “spiritual authorities” you know of? Yeah, they are saying the same things I was saying for the first few years into my sadhana. That’s because they are where I was for the first few years of practice. However, I moved on; they haven’t. They didn’t transcend the first phases of understanding, and are basically regurgitating what they were taught and copy-pasting traditional teachings. They had some spiritual experiences. That’s all fine. But there’s more; much more.

The true meaning of the question isn’t that what I’m saying is surprising; it’s that people underestimate who I am by multiple orders of magnitude, and then their questions make sense. If you know who I am, the reason why I’m the only one who managed to understand certain things here becomes blatantly obvious.

I got some things because I remembered them, and that was possible because I was there. Why others didn’t? Obviously, they weren’t there. They couldn’t remember the cat in their lap playing with the pendant around their neck, or that special tone of consciousness of their friends; they weren’t there. Those people aren’t their friends. They were probably born eons later. I can remember how Sanat Kumar got the Jewel, because I was there, and it’s my fault, in a way. There are, let’s see, five people that I know of who have those events in personal experience, one of them being Sanat Kumar and he’s dead, the other being the Sentinel, who is also dead. Six, if I count the Jewel, and I should. That’s why I know those things, and all kinds of “spiritual people” don’t. I was there. I participated in cooking up this mess, and I am here to clean it up. I’m not some phase in spiritual evolution, the way people imagine those things. I’m not some guy who practiced yoga a lot. It just took a lot of effort to remember some of these things here, in this mud, and to repeat initiations from below, in the body.

Why was Buddha the first one to ever figure out Sanat Kumar down here? Because he seems to have been the first one to actually do anything Sanat Kumar minded enough to try to interfere. Why all kinds of “great teachers” completely failed to figure him out? Because they never did anything he had a problem with, probably. It’s interesting how Jesus had all kinds of issues with him, and “great saints” like Ramakrishna and his disciples had none. It kind of tells you something. Why did Satan interfere with me so much? It kind of tells you something, doesn’t it? If a dog is growling at the woods, you tend to wonder what is it that he’s seeing there that you aren’t.

14 thoughts on “Obviously”

  1. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eRUqSLZyb6A
    There is no better kind of madness than sprinting full speed in high heels across perforated metal plates on the ground. Or when “Brian Vance” wears a wristwatch on both wrists, or gets out of a cabriolet by jumping over the door with one leg while putting the other straight through the metal of the door.

    But it seems that soon it will no longer be possible to distinguish the imposed emotions of AI characters from the narrative that will be presented and used as some new kind of endless “filler” as a creator of desire.

    And all the used concepts subconsciously resonate with the viewer’s mind. It is becoming frightening.

    Until now, we had characters who had to be played by a real actor, say Clint Eastwood.

    Now, however, in this transitional period, we are getting characters who wear two watches on their wrists. Soon they will be wearing a used watch only on their left wrist. But that is exactly the problem.

    • The AI-programmed guy in the music video has a Watchman in his hand and is watching what is happening on the screen. Of course, all of it reaches him through a transmitted signal received by the antennas on the Watchman.

      What programmed madness, embedded into the code of this world.

      We exist within a compartmentalized, specially separated, isolated part of the spiritual world in which the parameters of the material have been set.

      A television has to receive a signal and convert it into an image on the screen.
      That is the concept AI has to credibly render within the fictional narrative of colored pixels that it presents to the viewer.

      What could intestinal bacteria possibly know about the concept of a refrigerator?

      But supposedly, as a machine, AI is supposed to understand a series of complex interconnected concepts and create an even more complex, meaningful narrative?

      And where does it get access to the content it combines, and on what levels does that content exist?

      As if the narrative AI stitches together, like parts of Frankenstein, will initiate the majority of viewers into a highly spiritual state?

      With what — Satanic concepts?
      Of course, cigarette smoke rises upward and drifts.

        • You know, you have entered a concrete Virtual Reality. You were “born” here in the material world, and your memory was erased; you had no concepts of anything. Along the way, you were forced to build concepts from zero — concepts reflected by this world. That is all you can perceive by default.

          It was the same with Siddhartha Gautama. He, too, was “born” here with his memory erased — that is the prerequisite for entering this world — without any concepts of anything. After growing from a child into a young man, he became capable of perceiving a new dimension of concepts that had previously meant nothing to him, and which he therefore had not even seen: he encountered the presence of old age, sickness, and death. Then, through yoga and Darshan, he came to realize even that which, in this world, is unknowable to an ordinary person.

          • If you look at the Buddha’s eyes — the eyes with which the Buddha is depicted — those eyes represent an instrument through which, just as through the eye-instrument of an ordinary person, rays of light enter the retina and continue onward into the organ of sight: the visual center in the brain. The physical body, including the eye as the instrument of vision, is a product of this material world. Here, within this Virtual Reality, the parameters of its aging are defined. The body is the avatar of VR, by which you are limited and which you operate.

            The Buddha’s gaze has a specific appearance. The eyes of the being behind that gaze look depicted differently from the eyes of ordinary people painted around the Buddha. This is because, in such a being, although the mechanism of image transmission — the reflection of light from the objects of this world — is the same in the Buddha and in an ordinary person, in the Buddha this information about the surrounding world, in this case the material world, because the Buddha was evidently physically incarnated here in the material world, reaches a being in whom the four elements have no footing.

            Therefore, he sees the same physical elements as you do, but he sees the moments that move beings within their affected states. An ordinary person does not understand this because he is “born” into, and immersed in, a world whose concepts he is hardwired to from birth.

            Simply put, the Buddha sees “through”; you do not.

            • And now we come to a kind of final question concerning this Virtual Reality, whose parameters someone has diligently set.

              Why, in fact, is Satan driving the beings he has bound to this material world more and more insane? And what is he actually doing to them?

              Everyone and everything is connected to the provider: the Mind of God. How long did Satan think he could abuse, block, and deceive the provider?

  2. „Why was Buddha the first one to ever figure out Sanat Kumar down here? Because he seems to have been the first one to actually do anything Sanat Kumar minded enough to try to interfere. Why all kinds of “great teachers” completely failed to figure him out? Because they never did anything he had a problem with, probably. It’s interesting how Jesus had all kinds of issues with him, and “great saints” like Ramakrishna and his disciples had none. It kind of tells you something. Why did Satan interfere with me so much? It kind of tells you something, doesn’t it? If a dog is growling at the woods, you tend to wonder what is it that he’s seeing there that you aren’t.“

    In cosmetic products, only a small percentage of the composition consists of active substances; the rest is “filler,” whose purpose is to increase the volume of the product. By analogy, the Devil populated the world with his own kind of filler — zombies who represent his aesthetic norms.

    There are, in fact, experiments that show how such a mechanism works:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o8BkzvP19v4
    Then Jesus came, and the Devil decided to remove him from the game.

    If the Devil felt the need to physically eliminate him while disguising his deed by delegating such an evil act through several layers of various human packs, among whom Satanic ethics had become a domesticated norm, then the targeted person obviously represented a different system of values.

    There is an interesting thought regarding the idea that the Devil ultimately eliminated Jesus from the material world. Namely, where is the person of Jesus now? What I mean is that, if there is a continuity of existence among coherent spiritual beings, then there should also be knowledge beyond this material world about his nature and about what is taking place here.

      • So, this means that we are in a compartmentalized part of the spiritual world — an underworld in which specific rules and laws have been established, where the engineer of such an isolated, constructed place expects to create or prove his own projections.

        And the entire spiritual world is possible because there exists a substrate that carries everything — the Mind of God.

        • I have a question for the average individual. Let us say that such an average person observes and evaluates the following situation: imagine that they have before them another average person, and that they are supposed to observe how this person in front of them could possibly succeed in developing characteristics and qualities that no one around them possesses.

          In short, how could a human being acquire or develop qualities characteristic of a Deity?

          Danijel, I remember your statement that you were shocked when you realized that the Gods do not actually want everyone to be saved, but rather that the worthy be filtered and distinguished from the worthless. In other words, that individual beings, through their own choices and actions, define their future destiny.

          Let me reflect a little on this world… Jesus was physically brutalized to the extreme — according to Satan’s recipe, in Satan’s world, under Satan’s rules, and beneath his conducting hand. Gonzalo was deliberately physically ruined to the point of pneumonia, and then they deliberately waited for him to die. In contrast to the previous two, Ivo — the grand traitor known as “Ćaća” — is protected and rehabilitated by Satanic scripts into a life of luxury and is prematurely released from prison, with powerful friends at his side. These are warnings that this world sends out before the average person like neon signposts.

          To what extent should one interfere with the status quo of how the world functions? Is everything left to external governance, or is dismantling from within expected — because this world induces nausea?

            • : ))) Of course, and even more than that: average people also go to the “Cathedral” in their own city. That sort of foolishness was something the head of the department where I work wanted me to confirm to her yesterday over the phone.

              She wanted to have it confirmed after I had presented her with a different perspective on her foolishness and on her dilettantish attitude toward the scum she listens to and aligns herself with.

              And she did not merely sound that way — she was frightened. Terrified? I am not sure, but very possibly.

              • Listen, I was out of electricity today for three hours or so because some guy hit the trafo pole with a truck – and by hit I mean he drove into it, not backed up into it. I don't know if he was drunk, on drugs, on the phone, tired because he watched Croatia lose during the night instead of sleeping, but you need to be a really proper idiot to hit that pole, it's not really on the street but like meter away and on a slight incline, so you can imagine how that dumbass was driving. The concrete on the other trafo across the street was also smashed the same way a year ago, but that one is harder to break because there's a stone wall behind it.
                When you're asking me about the average individual, have in mind that average IQ in Croatia is 99.32, and I listened to a few particularly loud ones on the ferry yesterday proudly regurgitating what they read in the newspapers about Russia and Ukraine. They are proud of reading the newspapers – they are informed and educated people, you know. 🙂
                Whatever you think is impossibly stupid, is an incredibly high bar for an average individual, trust me.

Leave a Reply