X-Ftn-To: Gordon Video(VFX)

"Gordon Video\(VFX\)" wrote:
>Risk of AIDS and other STDs (possible deaths)

Probably only if you blow something else, thinking it's a joint. ;)

--
Homepage: http://www.danijel.org

X-Ftn-To: Gwailoh-9

Gwailoh-9 wrote:
>And
>blue-skin Shiva (?)

Blue throath (nilakantha).

>turned blue from eating poison right?

No. He was left with a small blue scar in the throat, after ingesting
all the poison that threatened to destroy the three worlds and
everybody in them.

>Curiously,
>the psilocybin mushroom turns blue when picked, which is one of the
>ways to help distinguish it from poison mushrooms. coincidence?)

Not even coincidence, except for the blue color.
Besides, mushrooms are dangerous. You can't rely on the exact chemical
balance in most species; the same species of mushrooms builds up
different chemicals, depending on the terrain and climate. The
Russians, for instance, use amanita muscaria with vodka in order to
get high. Their variety has less muscarine and more atropine compared
to the variety that grows in other parts of the world, and it once
happened that some Russians tried their recipe with the Croatian
amanitas and got seriously poisoned. Our variety is much more toxic
than theirs.
There is another mushroom, also amanita, which is OK to eat if you
boil it first and throw away the water: amanita rubescens. Every now
and then some people die of poisoning - always the mushroom experts,
because nobody else eats it- because there is a poisonous variety,
totally indistinguishable from the edible kind: amanita
pseudorubescens.
So, if someone wants to get high, mushrooms aren't very safe, you can
get yourself killed just like that. The varieties that contain
psychotropic substances - cortinarius, psilocybe, clitocybe, amanita -
contain some of the most poisonous varieties of mushrooms, and are
notorious as instable.
Disclaimer: I'm not a mycologist, I just collect mushrooms for lunch
when I walk through the forests, and I have to know some things about
them in order not to pick the wrong kind.

--
Homepage: http://www.danijel.org

X-Ftn-To: Darko Majdic

Darko Majdic wrote:

>Bruno was not condemned for his defence of the Copernican system of
>astronomy, nor for his doctrine of the plurality of inhabited worlds, but
>for his theological errors, among which were the following: that Christ
>was not God but merely an unusually skilful magician, that the Holy Ghost
>is the soul of the world, that the Devil will be saved, etc.
>(http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/03016a.htm)

To je razlog da mu se eventualno smiju, ili da ga izopce iz Crkve, ili
da oblijepe grad plakatima na kojima se s njega sprdaju, ali nije
razlog da ga muce i daju spaliti. Ja se recimo s dosta ljudi ne slazem
ali to neslaganje ostaje na javnom ismijavanju po konfi, jos mi nije
palo na pamet da nekoga idem fizicki likvidirati.

>Time, dakako, ne opravdavam taj cin, vec samo hocu reci da ako se Crkva i
>protivila kome zbog njegovih znanstvenih dostignuca, Giordano Bruno nije
>bio taj.

Imaj u vidu da su Nikolu Kopernika spalili, koliko se ja sjecam, a
Galileo Galilei je umro u kucnom pritvoru zbog tvrdnji da Zemlja nije
srediste svijeta.

--
Homepage: http://www.danijel.org

X-Ftn-To: Formerly Seeking Connection

Formerly Seeking Connection wrote:
>Fortunately for me, I was finally able to find an
>>enlightened one taking orders at a fast food restaurant who tapped me
>>on the head a couple of times and returned me to the unenlightened
>>state of being.
>
>Wouldn't Lithium have worked. Brings you right down. Western Psych.
>Solution.

You'd most certainly know. Your astral body looks like it's been
through a blender.

--
Homepage: http://www.danijel.org

X-Ftn-To: Ed Penaut

EPenaut@jalderwinds.com (Ed Penaut) wrote:
>And why is
>it that so many of the supposed englightened teachers are not?

:) The way of the world, I guess. :) Spiritual midgets pose as great
enlightened teachers, while enlightened ones serve hamburgers and
program databases.
Actually, when you find a "spiritually inclined" group of people, you
can be sure that it consists mostly of crazy people who probably got a
weekend off from the lunatic assylum - look at this newsgroup, for
instance, and it's comparatively OK, when you look at some of the
others.

But, I'd like to know what was it, that you call "enlightenment"? I
have a pretty good idea, I think that your vertical blew right open by
accident. I saw similar things, but they usually last very short.
Shit, I'd really like to see you f2f, it's a bummer that I'm on the
other side of the globe.

--
Homepage: http://www.danijel.org

X-Ftn-To: Vicko Vitasovic

"Vicko Vitasovic" wrote:
>Osim toga, kako znas da nemam misticna iskustva?

:))))) Duso draga, za to ne treba biti ni vidovit. :))))

--
Homepage: http://www.danijel.org

X-Ftn-To: Aco Momcilovic (a.k.a. Never)

"Aco Momcilovic (a.k.a. Never)" wrote:
>>"Sinisa Knezevic" wrote:
>>>A kako znas da takvi koji su, kako kazes, postigli nesto mozda ne zaobilaze
>>>tebe na putu k Bogu ili ti glumis sv.Petra s kljucevima?
>>
>>E primjer za to, naime da netko ide _zaobilaziti_ mene, a da usprkos
>>tome dodje do Boga, bih _fakat_ htio vidjeti.
>>Kome ne odgovaram ja, tome ne odgovara ni Bog.
>
>Jebote vidi slucajnosti - to tvrde i krscani :))))))))))))))

Svatko moze svasta tvrditi, ali nije pitanje tko sto tvrdi, nego tko
ima pravo.

--
Homepage: http://www.danijel.org

X-Ftn-To: Darko Majdic

Darko Majdic wrote:
>Ako vec mislis da znas nesto o Girodanu Brunu, hajde da te pitam:
>
>Za sto je Giordano bio optuzen, osudjen i potom spaljen, prema sudskoj
>dokumentaciji?

Za panteizam. :) Sva sreca da crkva danas nema nikakvu moc, jer bi
inace nas dobri Vicko i njemu srodna ekipa lozili lomace.

--
Homepage: http://www.danijel.org

X-Ftn-To: Vicko Vitasovic

"Vicko Vitasovic" wrote:


To je sve tocno i stoji, ali vazi za ljude odredjenog psihickog
profila, koji doista funkcioniraju na takav nacin, a mogu se sresti u
magijskim i sotonistickim krugovima; u nasim krajevima mi na pamet
pada prije svega Slavinski, kao izrazit primjer tog mentaliteta.
Ima toga i ovdje na konfi, ali nemam dojam da takva gledista
prevladavaju. Zapravo, veci je problem licemjerje, nego magija, buduci
da se magijom tog tipa, kao i laznom mistikom, ovdje zele baviti mozda
dvojica-trojica, a licemjerju je podlozan ogroman broj sudionika. Da
ne pricam o samozavaravanju i ispraznosti intelektualne religioznosti,
koja je veci problem i od magije, jer magijom barem mozes vidjeti
nesto, koliko god to bilo blesavo i stetno, a ovako ni toliko, a meni
se cini da je bolje i grijesiti i sjebati se, pa iz toga barem nauciti
sto treba izbjegavati, nego ne raditi nista i u tome biti savrseno
siguran, a ne nauciti ama bas nista.

--
Homepage: http://www.danijel.org

X-Ftn-To: Sinisa Knezevic

"Sinisa Knezevic" wrote:
>> E primjer za to, naime da netko ide _zaobilaziti_ mene, a da usprkos
>> tome dodje do Boga, bih _fakat_ htio vidjeti.
>> Kome ne odgovaram ja, tome ne odgovara ni Bog.
>
>Jasna je ta tvoja izjava jer ti, buduci da si uskladjen s Voljom, ocitujes
>taj sklad u svijet i svatko, tko ti icim se protivi, protivi se ujedno Volji
>Bozjoj.
>No, trebao bi znati, da kada postanes svjestan sklada ispadas iz njega. Kada
>netko postane svjestan svoje svetosti, ista se pretvara u farizejstinu.
>Svetost nije nesto sto se moze opazati na sebi vec na drugima.

To je cisto sranje. Meni je ista stvar reci da je BMW dobar auto kao i
da Danijel predstavlja Bozju nazocnost u svijetu.
Ovo s farizejstinom mi vise lici na Tebe.

--
Homepage: http://www.danijel.org