America and the UK are quite hysterically trying to start a war with Russia, and not just any kind of war, but an indirect one where the Ukrainians will die, and they will sell weapons. I was thinking about reasons for that, and they seem to be multiple and layered.

The first is that a war would help their economies, which are beyond the brink of collapse, and are artificially made to look like they are functioning due to enormous amounts of money printing. Basically, the only companies that are actually functioning there are Amazon, Apple, Google, Netflix, Microsoft, Tesla and similar tech giants. Amazon is making good money due to covid restrictions, because people are ordering things online, but this is at the expense of brick and mortar stores, and I would say that it is producing a net loss for the economy in general. Apple is profiting from Intel and AMD being stuck with inefficient x86 technology, and from their own investment in ARM instruction set SOC. Google is an advertisement-powered censorship engine, basically working on directing society into questionable directions and financing it by getting people to buy stuff. Netflix is a leftist propaganda platform that tries to mask their actual product as entertainment. Microsoft is selling mostly their hosting services that compete with Amazon AWS, and Tesla is transitioning from selling mostly bullshit to selling mostly cars, although with half a steering wheel (because they apparently don’t have winding mountain roads in America) and no gear shifter, because the car “knows better” whether you want to go forward or back at a parking lot. I couldn’t make this shit up. In any case, their stock market consists of those few big names, that sell mostly entertainment and ads, and an army of the walking dead. The entire thing is starting to unravel, and America desperately needs a distraction that will then be blamed for all the problems, like covid was released/exploited to wind down the overheated economy gradually and reduce the intensity of the inevitable crash.

Also, America wants to prevent Europe from becoming their competition by forming useful bilateral economic ties with China and Russia, and keep it in a position of a vassal entity that will be dependent on buying overpriced American garbage, such as the “freedom gas” and iPhones. Having the EU not use the available Nord Stream pipeline with Russia, convincing EU to “have the free market lower the gas prices” and “not sign long term gas supply contracts with Russia to keep Russia on its toes” had the result of keeping Europe starved for energy during winter, and increasing the gas prices due to market speculation and artificially restricted supply. Also, if the Ukrainian pipeline “just happened” to stop working due to war with Russia, that would be a real shame because then the EU would have no choice but to buy “freedom gas”. Of course, the Ukrainians would freeze and starve in that case, but they are seen as more trouble than they are worth anyway; the country itself was sucked dry already and both EU and America would have to actually start to invest resources in it to keep it viable, and will serve nicely as cannon fodder in a nice little war that will both hamper Russia’s economic development, kill Russians at both sides of the front line, and line pockets of American and UK companies with money.

This wonderful plan is not really working because Russia is somehow too stupid to fall into this trap despite all the wonderful things it has to gain from it, such as millions of impoverished dependent people to suck its resources dry, neglected and devastated infrastructure that would have to be rebuilt, and population whose significant portion is indoctrinated to hate them. Instead, the stupid Russians, who failed to get the hint that they are supposed to be invading Ukraine, are turning to China to sign economic, political and military deals, and made a joint statement which can be summed up to a joint Russian-Chinese middle finger to the collective West – “screw you, we are carving our own path together and leaving you behind, because we’re done with your shit”.

The funniest thing is that America and the UK recently demonstrated complete inability to think strategically, by screwing France over with that AUKUS submarine deal with Australia, and thought they could just assume complete NATO unity over Russia a month later; France decided it’s payback time, so Macron went to Russia, and made a joint statement with Putin which basically completely backs Russian position regarding Ukraine – it can’t join NATO because it has a state policy of “returning” Crimea by military means and tries to get NATO to be their little bitch and fight their war for them, so France basically said “no submarine deal, no war with Russia, because we’re done being abused and exploited by America and their dickless lap dog”. I wonder how the CIA-controlled Western media are going to spin this, but it might be insane enough to be entertaining. I somehow doubt it; it’s usually just depressing.

Most other EU countries aren’t that interested in fighting Russia for the sake of the incredibly corrupt and nasty Ukrainians, either, despite American pressure, so all the talk about NATO unity basically serves to hide the fact that there isn’t any. Most Eastern European countries joined NATO because they saw it as a way of “making progress” by going in a generally westward direction, at the point where Russia didn’t look like any kind of a strategic enemy anymore, so the idea of a new cold war (that actually looks like it’s about to turn hot) is very far from what they think they subscribed to.

Furthermore, Russia not only refused to play a role in the American script, but turned the table and issued a “non-ultimatum” which basically tells the Americans to remove their shit from the Russian borders and back to the pre-1997 positions, or things will take a non-diplomatic turn, which is so far from America’s ability to comprehend that they kept talking about Ukraine as if anybody in Russia gives a damn. The Russians actually made it quite clear that it’s America they have a problem with, not their vassal states and “alliances”, and now that the Americans rejected this “non-ultimatum”, it remains to be seen what Russia will do. One thing is certain: France will sit this one out, and judging by the wide-eyed terror displayed by most of NATO countries, America and the UK will be on their own against Russia and China, and absolutely nobody will be there to help them, while France will make lucrative military and economic deals with the Russia-China alliance, soon to be joined by other major world countries.

From what I can see, America is scheming to cook up a scenario where China and Russia will wage pointless, fratricidal wars against their renegade provinces, both getting weaker in the process, and unable to help each other against the common enemy.

Let’s see how they respond.

I find it nauseating when I hear the leftists planning another round of “eating the rich”, of dealing with the “class enemy”, and I particularly find it disgusting when they assume the virtuous posture.

I accidentally found an enhanced, colorized photo, processed by the modern AI, of what the communists would call “class enemy”, and what I would call a perfectly innocent girl, who was 19 years old when she, along with the rest of her family, was shot, stabbed by bayonets, shot again, and her face mashed into a bloody pulp by rifle butts so that it wouldn’t be recognizable, and then buried in the woods.

So let’s see the face of the class enemy, that had to be mashed into a pulp so that the working class could live in their communist paradise.
Let me present Maria Nikolaevna Romanova:

This is the AI enhanced photo of Maria: Let’s see what Wikipedia says about her death by Lenin’s thugs:

The Russian Imperial Romanov family (Nicholas II of Russia, his wife Alexandra Feodorovna, and their five children: Olga, Tatiana, Maria, Anastasia, and Alexei) were shot and bayoneted to death^[1][2] by Bolshevik revolutionaries under Yakov Yurovsky on the orders of the Ural Regional Soviet in Yekaterinburg on the night of 16–17 July 1918. Also murdered that night were retainers who had accompanied them, notably Eugene Botkin, Anna Demidova, Alexei Trupp, and Ivan Kharitonov.^[3] The bodies were taken to the Koptyaki forest, where they were stripped, buried, and mutilated with grenades to prevent identification.^[2][4]

But it is when you see her face, that you understand why the communist murderers had to mash it into a pulp to prevent identification, and perhaps even to make it appear monstrous, to hide the magnitude of the crime.

The communists are not the virtuous ones who kill monsters in order to achieve social justice. They are the monsters who kill the virtuous and the innocent, in order to create hell on Earth. They are enemies of God.

Perhaps the most chilling historical fact is that the body of the leader of the criminal gang that committed this and millions of other slaughters of the innocent, is displayed prominently in his own mausoleum in Moscow, while her remains (the parts that didn’t rot in an unmarked grave) are still poked and prodded for DNA evidence. Her AI enhanced image not only honors her memory, but also explains the true nature of communism better than any words I could muster, because you can’t really judge someone or something until you see the face of their enemy.

ps. I almost forgot; here’s what others said about her character:

Margaretta Eagar said that “Maria was born good… with the very smallest trace of original sin as possible.”^[34] According to Eagar, her older sisters Olga and Tatiana once referred to Maria as their “stepsister” because she was so good and never got into trouble. When she stole biscuits from her mother’s tea table, Nicholas said that he was relieved “to see she is only a human child” because he “was always afraid of the wings growing.”

So yes, that truly is the spirit of the class enemy that had to be eradicated.

I’m watching this:

… and I’m thinking, the Americans are always “leading”, they are “making progress”, and they are never having problems, they are having “challenges”, which is what one does if he’s in a dominant position; there are things challenging his dominance and “leadership”.

They never fail, they never lose, they never fuck up. There are no negative things out there, just “challenges” that will be “overcome” as “progress” is made in the course of their “leadership”.

What an incredibly arrogant and stupid people they are.

How does one know whether he’s been making progress or not before the war is actually over and one can retrospect? Why do you say problems are “challenges”, as if they are communicating personally with you? Is the fact that you will die if you jump off a tall building a “challenge”, or is it better to say it’s a limitation you need to work with? If it’s a challenge, it means you need to overcome it, but that’s a very dangerous position to have in politics; for instance, you can see a powerful sovereign country like Russia or China as a challenge, which will lead you into a mutually destructive conflict, or you can see it simply as a state of things – you have interests and goals, others do as well, and now you need to negotiate with them, haggle, make deals, cooperate in mutually beneficial ways. If others having any power is a “challenge”, what does that mean, that you have to work on making everybody else into a powerless slave before you’re happy, and you’ll see every instance of freedom, sovereignty and independence of others as a threat, a “challenge”, until you are universally seen as such a menace to others, they will join forces against you and destroy you like a mad dog that you are?

I knew a person who always stated he’s making progress, every day; always positive stuff going on, always learning new lessons, and some other bullshit. An unbiased bystander would see him and conclude he’s completely deluded, because his situation was stagnant at best and degrading desperately at worst, and there wasn’t a single positive thing about it whatsoever, and that was mostly because of his insistence that everything negative is actually positive. Sometimes progress is possible only after you admit you have failed – you did everything wrong, you deluded yourself and you are now facing a disaster, and it’s not that all the bad things necessarily happen for the best, they can happen because you’re a damn fool who made all the wrong calls, persisted on a wrong path and is now facing utter ruin in all respects. That’s the point where you can possibly save yourself if you repent, if you admit failure, and concede defeat, so that you can learn what you did wrong, and do better. If you claim you’re winning and making progress while you’re on a path towards your ruin, and you provoke other powers in their back yard, claiming you’re “challenging their excessive claims” and “answering their challenges”, all this “positivity” will increase the chances of your country becoming a glass parking lot.

America is an incredible country – founded on the principles of arrogance and Satanism, but thinking they are God’s chosen people for some reason. Even their most common variety of Christianity is based on shallow and selective thinking, and incredible self-serving arrogance.