Legitimacy of deep strikes

I just found this:

“It is completely legitimate for Ukraine to be targeting in Russia’s depth in order to disrupt the logistics that if they weren’t disrupted would directly contribute to death and carnage on Ukrainian soil,” Heappey told Times Radio.

Let’s enter slight reciprocal corrections, shall we?

“It is completely legitimate for Russia to be targeting in NATO countries’ depth in order to disrupt the logistics that if they weren’t disrupted would directly contribute to death and carnage on Ukrainian soil”

I can’t say I would disagree with that. It’s obvious that NATO is the actual party at war with Russia, providing logistics and weaponry to Ukraine.

Besides, America already stated that they are at war with Russia:

Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin told reporters after a trip to Kyiv that “we want to see Russia weakened to the degree that it can’t do the kinds of things that it has done in invading Ukraine.” The new US goal is “to defeat Russia on the battlefield so decisively that it will refrain from any new attacks.”

It’s obvious that they are pissing on Russia, and Russia is trying to keep the pretence that it’s raining.

About deterrence and genocide

Paul Craig Roberts wrote an article in which he expresses a viewpoint that the Russian gradual and slow approach to the Ukraine war will only encourage American war hawks, giving them the false impression that Russia is weaker than it is, and that attacking them in a nuclear war might actually be a good idea. He thinks it would’ve been better if Russia ran over Ukraine with overwhelming force and simply killed everybody. That would supposedly give Americans pause.

Dmitry Orlov responded on the Saker blog with an emotional article that accuses Roberts of advocating for genocide of Ukrainians, accuses Roberts of pontificating to Russia, and argues that Russian approach will flood the Europe with Western Ukrainian refugees which is good because it will harm Europe, free Ukraine of people who hate Russia, and so on.

I think both sides are under a misapprehension of some kind; Roberts thinks that the nuclear war is preventable. I don’t think it is, because the clique in America that holds literally ALL the power sees such a war as a necessary part of re-arranging the world so that America can have its collapse and emerge as the dominant force decades later. Whatever Russia does or doesn’t do, the outcome will be the same, because it isn’t about how weak they think you are, it’s about what they actually want to do. What they want to do is degrade all possible competition to a position worse than their own for at least the duration of their collapse and presumed recovery.

Orlov, on the other hand, is working under a misapprehension that the amount of killing that would in present circumstances be called genocide matters in the large scale of things. I don’t think it does; even the most strong-armed approach by Russia would probably only increase the speed of killing, not change the ultimate outcome, if Mariupol is any indication, and I believe it is. Basically, with more troops and bombs you end up with the same level of destruction in the timeframe of days instead of weeks, which might actually reduce the time civilians spend in basements starving or risking their lives looking for food and water. Also, he is thinking emotionally and not strategically, and that’s good if you’re taking care of individual people, but it’s not good if you’re trying to come up with some kind of a stable and livable scenario. For instance, let’s say Russia spares the West Ukraine. There’s no bombing, no civilians killed there. It leaves them in a better position to attack Russia later, and they have no personal experience that would advise them against this course. This results in postponed bloodshed, where Russia still has to run them over, but likely more people die, and, more importantly, more Russians die, because I don’t really care that much about the Banderites, considering how they are likely the worst people in the world.

So, the real question isn’t genocide or not. There’s going to be genocide regardless. The Ukrops are going to kill all Russian speaking Ukrainians after this. Unless they are killed, they will make a hell on Earth. Deaths and suffering are inevitable, it’s just a matter of who dies, in what way and order, and how quickly. Also, having in mind that the nuclear war is inevitable, leaving a country full of vile indoctrinated Russia-haters at your doorstep, leaving it intact and with no worry other than how to harm you more when you’re down, is a very bad idea. I agree with Roberts that Ukraine would be best completely wiped out; it would be perfectly unwise to leave them sufficiently intact and able to form a threat in the quite probable near future. However, the fact is that both Russian people and their political leadership are incredibly unwilling to have a nuclear war with the West, and their “weak” approach reflects this unwillingness. It is also the fact that the Americans see this as encouragement and proof of their supremacy, which is a grave mistake, because Russia is actually stronger militarily. However, I wargamed a very large pool of options and the only situation where there isn’t a nuclear war is if something disrupts everything out of the blue, to the point where it makes American plans obsolete – a supervolcanic eruption in America, a huge asteroid strike, a gigantic solar flare that wipes out the technosphere and so on. In any normal scenario, it doesn’t really matter what Russia or China do, because they are not the ones trying to have a nuclear war; they are playing with black figures, so to speak, and America doesn’t really have a de-escalation mode in their political scene.

Artificial shortages, inflation and fuck the governments

I heard something interesting recently.

Everybody following the silver stacking community knows there are huge shortages and resulting huge premiums on American silver eagles, the most popular 1oz stacking coin in America. It is also known that the US Mint has been causing the shortages by not producing enough coins, and this has been attributed mostly to covid lockdowns, but apparently the whole thing was misunderstood, in light of what I’ve heard: that the US Mint actually can’t source “blanks” (essentially “empty” coins of correct dimensions and purity produced by a third party, which are then bought and finished in the sovereign mint) because of a law that forces them to source the material at spot price, and the spot price is artificially kept so low using various paper trickery, that nobody actually wants to sell them silver at that price. Since absolutely everything is sold at a “premium” over spot, including 1000oz industrial bars, “spot” price is actually the price of absolutely nothing at the moment.

This made me think about such laws, combined with fake “official” prices that don’t reflect market realities, and what happens when physical realities assert themselves, and I remembered shortages in Yugoslavia. It’s not that the shortages were necessarily caused by lack of goods; they were caused by the state attempt to keep the prices low, and basically at those prices the manufacturers had no incentive to produce and sell, because they would do so at a loss. Failure to allow prices to surge upwards in an inflationary environment causes shortages. The more the state tries to intervene, the worse it gets. That’s what happened in the occupied Germany after WW2; the Americans implemented a tight price control which caused shortages. The only way someone actually fixed the problem was when they removed all price restrictions (the wording of the American-written law prohibited changing the restrictions, but didn’t say anything about removing them altogether), allowing the prices to go wherever the market dictated, which almost immediately created supply and normalised the market. One would expect that the Americans, with all their talk about free market economy and all, knew better than to impose price restrictions, but apparently not. However, the correlation between governments trying to control prices in an inflationary environment, thus trying to hide inflation, and trying to implement misguided social policy by trying to keep food and energy prices low after they successfully destroyed the purchasing power of the currency by money printing, is historically well established. In such a country you can always see official, “legitimate” stores with empty shelves and low prices, and “black market” where you can buy anything, but at the actual market prices, and for “real money”.

Another thing crossed my mind recently, when I had to pay cash for hotel because due to all sorts of Easter holidays I could not transfer money between accounts, and I almost ended up sleeping in the car because the entire booking process was done digitally on the Internet, and I got a confirmation of the reservation and all, but the trick is, it all existed only between computers, and no human ever saw any of it because they were all on holiday, and so nobody was there in the hotel reception and nobody knew we were coming. We did manage to contact someone through a phone number handwritten on a piece of paper at the reception door, but it was a close call indeed. The point I’m trying to make is that I joked with the receptionist that people are wrong when they think that the computers will kill us by making Terminator-like extermination robots; no, they will kill us by digital money simply not working, after all the physical cash is withdrawn from circulation as “primitive” and “obsolete”. Also, the Croatian tax service introduced something called “fiscalisation”, meaning that every retail transaction has to be registered online with the tax service in order for the seller not to be liable for a tax evasion fine. Imagine how well that would work if the Internet went out. Also, imagine if they replaced conventional money with something that relies on the transaction being registered on the blockchain. Basically, the Internet goes down and everybody is suddenly reduced to bartering things for food, because we all got suckered by our God damn thieving governments, and I mean ALL governments everywhere. They are all thieves and bastards. They initially sold us the fashion of using paper notes instead of gold and silver coins, because it’s more modern, more practical and elegant. Peasants use coins, gentlemen use banknotes, so we all used banknotes, but don’t you worry, banknotes are as good as gold. Ooops, convertibility of banknotes to gold was “suspended indefinitely”, but don’t you worry, it’s just to prevent “gold hoarding”, it’s still good money. Ooops, no it’s not, it keeps devaluating. Also only criminals and terrorists use cash, and all sorts of diseases spread through cash so don’t use cash, use credit cards and digital payment, it’s as good as cash but oops, the governments can now trace every transaction, and not only that, they can “sanction” you if they don’t like your political attitudes, and “freeze” your digital assets and make your cards stop working if you’re not obedient to the current democratorship. But don’t you worry, when they completely remove cash, because terrorists and drug dealers, and because little babies will cry if they don’t remove it, and they can control everybody’s money from a central point, everything is going to be great, because only the crazy conspiracy theorists don’t trust the government, right? We need to prevent financing terrorism and “money laundering”, right? Actually, when truckers protesting against vaccination mandates are “terrorists”, and avoiding insanely excessive taxation introduced because the governments have to somehow pay for all the spying, restrictions and oppression is “money laundering”, I reserve my God-given right to be a terrorist and to launder my money as much as I feel like, thank you very much for your concern and please accept my dick up your arse if you don’t like it.

Russian propaganda

The Western intelligence services managed to prove two things conclusively in their massive, centrally orchestrated campaign against Russia during the intervention in Ukraine.

First is that the entirety of Western “free press” is totally controlled from a central point and serves the purpose of disseminating propaganda originating in Langley. Those of us who have been paying attention knew this for quite some time already, but fresh evidence doesn’t hurt.

The second is that the Russian media influence is so minuscule, their voice is not being heard, AT ALL. People in the West learn things about Russia exclusively from the enemies of Russia. As a corollary, the idea that Russian intelligence outreach and propagandistic influence are so intense and sophisticated that they are able to influence elections in America and promote brexit and so on, was conclusively proven to be not only wrong, but also completely ridiculous, and by overdoing the propaganda effort regarding Ukraine Langley managed to prove this conclusively and thus score an own-goal. Not only is the Russian side inaudible, it’s also quite obviously very unskilled in communicating their point across; when I see their generals making reports, it makes me feel as if I’m in the 1940s. Also, since their army prohibited the soldiers from using smartphones, they had a complete lack of actual footage from the war from the Russian standpoint, which extremely facilitated the Ukrainians in disseminating their propaganda to the news-hungry Internet. The Russians comfort themselves by saying that wars are not won on the Internet, which is true; no amount of propaganda can help the Ukrainians actually win. However, what propaganda managed to do is create a fictitious “reality” in the West, which will make it very easy for the American-controlled politicians to promote policies that will harm Russian interests even in the short-term; for instance, Sweden and Finland are joining NATO, all kinds of NATO countries will host American nuclear weapons and who knows what else, everybody is funneling weapons into Ukraine, and what was left of freedom in the West after the covid hysteria will be permanently lost and everybody here will be reduced to absolute and total subservience to the government. Everything here in the West is turning into a giant prison, and our only hope is for the Russians to nuke the bastards, because they have been gradually building the infrastructure for complete multi-spectrum enslavement of the population for quite some time, and at least since 9/11. It’s actually not possible for citizens of one country to overthrow their government and free themselves, because each country is so interconnected with the international monetary and political superstructures, that the country’s economy would be instantly subjected to “sanctions” and destroyed, because the dictatorships and tyrannies are no longer national; we are literally dealing with tyrannical oversight at the level of the American-controlled part of the world, and American “sanctions” are enforced by other countries that are afraid of America, and apparently everybody is afraid of America, even Russia.