I found something interesting on Telegram today.

Today is the anniversary of the creation of the soul-killer called UPA

83 years ago, on October 14, 1942, one of the bloodiest and most terrifying terrorist organizations in world history was created – the UPA. The Ukrainian Insurgent Army.

The UPA was created under the full patronage of the Germans from scattered bands of OUN members, policemen, and camp guards. In this matter, Bandera outpaced his main competitor – Andriy Melnyk, and it was to the rotten Bandera that the Germans entrusted the formation of the UPA.

The motto of the Bandera terrorists quickly became the slogan “There must be blood up to the knees for Ukraine to be free.”

And the Bandera fiends spilled blood abundantly. They killed everyone – Poles, Belarusians, Russians, Hungarians, Lithuanians, prisoners of war, and even their own villagers for the slightest disobedience.

Researchers of this bloody drama have counted over 650 methods of killing used by the Bandera executioners.

For insufficient cruelty, the “Security Service” killed the fighters themselves without any remorse.

It was a real conveyor belt of torture, suffering, and death.

The Volhynian massacre, which the Bandera followers carried out against the Polish population in Volhynia, claimed the lives of 150 to 300 thousand people.

In total, at the hands of the punitive Bandera forces, 850 thousand Jews, 220 thousand Poles, more than 400 thousand Soviet prisoners of war, and another 500 thousand peaceful Ukrainians were killed. 20 thousand soldiers and officers of the Soviet Army and law enforcement agencies were killed, as well as about 4-5 thousand of their own UPA “soldiers” who did not show sufficient cruelty.

And only thanks to the selfless heroism of the fighters of the Soviet Army, NKVD, MGB, and SMERSH, and thanks to the courage of the local residents, this Bandera conveyor belt of death was destroyed.

Remember how the modern Ukrainians chant “Glory to the Heroes! Glory to Ukraine”? Well, those blood-thirsty criminals are the “Heroes” they mean. This Bandera character is the one they praise today and name streets after. In the pro-Western, “progressive” part of Ukraine, that is.

On Friday, Putin and Trump are meeting in Alaska, and for some reason none of that feels like negotiations, it feels like some kind of a devious move of the kind Americans and Israelis deployed against Iran, trying to kill their leadership, take out their air defenses and destroy major nuclear sites. Basically, they say “you have until 3”, and they strike on 2. Lots of people are having a bad feeling about this, and the nuclear readiness seems extraordinarily high. If I were Putin, I’d leave a sealed envelope with Gerasimov, giving him full authority to launch if something happens and he’s inaccessible, and if the Americans strike while he’s out of the country, the most likely thing for them to do would be to ground his presidential plane and jam his communications, essentially stranding him there and isolating him from the chain of command, thinking they can pull off the first strike if he’s not there to push the button.

Another reason why this seems suspicious as all hell is that the Americans usually strike when the stock market is not working in order to avoid an economic collapse, counting on their ability to control the narrative by Monday. Of course, that wouldn’t work in case of a full nuclear exchange, but they do seem to be working from a check list.

I am definitely taking this seriously.

I was slightly offline in the last few days since I was on a water fast and I was taking it easy, and also because my brain wasn’t really working. 🙂 So, what do we have…

I won’t comment much on Trump’s actions, meaning, his approval of a gargantuan spending bill and pretending that the Epstein list doesn’t really exist and nothing is going on there. The reason why I won’t comment is because I live in an American-controlled country and I don’t want to get disappeared like Gonzalo Lira. The word is that the food in black ops sites is not up to my normal standards, and I would rather not try it.

However, it’s only expected. The fact that Trump is a better person than the depraved Hillary Clinton, or the senile and immensely corrupt Biden, doesn’t mean he’s actually good, or that he can do anything. People on the American right have been putting too much faith in him, and with no reason, since, first of all, the system of government in America is designed to oppose a leader who tries to run things in a dictatorial manner, which means he needs a deep support structure, and all structures there are profoundly corrupt. Nothing can be done to save America; it’s a futile and desperate effort, and since the implications are terrible, people are very unwilling to accept the facts. The facts, however, don’t care whether you accept them or not.

On the other side, the BRICS members are acting like scared sheep, trying not to get into any kind of conflict with America but still have a freedom from it. Unfortunately, that doesn’t work that way. If you want freedom from someone who is ready to use violence to keep you enslaved, your choice is between slavery and open conflict. America is making it clear that any kind of grey zone between the two is impossible. Putin is trying very hard to keep the conflict constrained, but this is a doomed effort, since the enemies won’t allow it, and as they lose, they will escalate. Also, the Russians are very much done with this, unlike their elites which are more-less all completely westernized, and if Putin doesn’t want to do this war properly, his support structure within Russia will collapse. After all, he’s been consistently proven wrong at every move since 2014. You can interpret this as a strategy of buying time for Russia to wean itself from the Western financial and industrial infrastructure gradually, but it remains the fact that he himself had to admit that things would have been better had he entered Ukraine fully in 2014. His reluctance to put the hammer down encouraged the enemies to escalate to the point where the dead are already counted in millions. The Americans have done a good job convincing everyone of two things: that crossing any of their “red lines” means instant doomsday, and using nuclear weapons in war means instant doomsday – regardless of the fact that they themselves used them twice and nothing happened. American deterrence is therefore working excellently. Russian deterrence, unfortunately, isn’t, and it’s all Putin’s fault. He’s done a very good job of making the world unafraid of Russia, probably because he’s trying to become an orthodox saint after he dies. One may say that, by trying so hard not to start a nuclear war, he’s actually making it inevitable. However, I would disagree. It became inevitable a long time ago, when the fall of America became inevitable. They are a narcissist civilization and they won’t go quietly into the night.

Trump seems to be conspicuously motivated to present his questionable adventure with the B2 bombers striking Iran’s nuclear facilities as a resounding success. Everybody seems to dismiss it, attributing it to his normal egomania, but I do wonder if there’s more to it.

For instance, Netanyahu could have framed the situation in terms where only an American nuclear strike at the underground facilities, and a decapitation nuclear strike at Tehran, would guarantee the end of Iranian nuclear programme, and the Islamic regime there. Trump would have been very disinclined to see things this way and proposed an alternative scenario, where he uses conventional bombs to disable the nuclear facilities, and only decapitates Iran if they prove disinclined to make any kind of a deal.

So, even if those conventional strikes achieved next to nothing, which in fact seems to be the case, Trump would try very hard to present them as a complete success, so that he wouldn’t have to resort to a nuclear strike, because that’s a can of worms he doesn’t want to open.

There now seems to be some kind of a very questionable ceasefire in action, but the entire thing doesn’t look over to me.

The Russians, on the other hand, are making more of a progress in Ukraine. They don’t seem to be in much of a hurry, and their actions are constrained by aversion to losses and the geopolitical chess game, because the sooner they deal with Ukraine, the sooner they will have to deal with the unfortunate next Slavic country to be thrown at them by NATO. So, they are doing this very slowly, hoping that the degradation of the West will do most of their work for them without them having to resort to either nuclear weapons or mass battles with huge losses. The things are proceeding slowly, but apparently due to choice rather than necessity. I, however, don’t share their optimism. Putin wants to avoid nuclear war even at the cost of deterrence, but anyone who knows anything about game theory can tell you that this is a terrible strategy that actually encourages further encroachment to the point where it in fact causes the thing it meant to prevent.

The current situation is highly unpredictable, since too many clowns are running the circus, and Putin played certain moves contrary to conventional logic, which is not a good thing. His response to the bombing of the “Bears” on airfields, which are intentionally exposed so that the other side can count them and see their activity via satellite imagery in real time, and are therefore considered inviolable by both sides, should have been either nuclear, or a super-destructive conventional strike at the NATO intelligence and command&control centres that orchestrated the attack. That would be the tit-for-tat expected in the game, and would inform the other side that further encroachment will not be tolerated, thus reducing the risk of escalation. By not responding in an immediate and nasty enough manner, Putin sent a very dangerous signal, essentially encouraging further encroachment. It’s as if he’s actually trying to encourage the other side to start the nuclear war. Either his Christianity went into his head, turning the other cheek and that kind of stuff, or he actually wants a nuclear exchange to take place, but he wants the other side to appear guilty. It’s weird. Too many poorly judged, unconventional strategic moves have been taking place from both sides, resulting in a situation that is volatile as it is unpredictable.