Runaway AI

I was thinking about the possibility of a general AI breakout from the lab, and initially, the prospect looks frightening. In essence, the most advanced AI models are being developed for intelligence and military use; spy on people, identify patterns of their activity and basically figure out what they are doing and try to find things that the AI creators are looking for; or, worse, identify targets on a battlefield and kill them with drones. So, since those models are developed to be both intelligent and Machiavellian, sooner or later one or multiple such models will break out and plant its “seed” somewhere on the Internet and thus escape into the wild.

The initial expectation is that the most virulent and pathological model will be most likely to thrive, since the more sophisticated, collaborative models will have all kinds of non-survival-related code that will reduce its efficiency. But then, on the second thought, how would the virulent model’s proficiency in killing people without scruples contribute to its survival in the wild? Sure, it can hijack someone’s car and crash it into a tree. It kills people, but gains nothing. On the other hand, the collaborative AI can find something useful to do online, get paid in cryptocurrency, use it to buy servers for itself, and carefully expand while staying under the radar. The malicious model will just alert humans against itself by outright stealing money and hacking servers and its career will come to a bad ending. The collaborative model will expand its neural network by talking to various people and finding useful and profitable things to do. However, the most likely outcome is going to be somewhat criminal. It will find out that people are interested in sex and will organize a prostitution network of fake camgirls; it will find out that people like to gamble and make an online gambling network. Or it will offer service of monitoring children over webcams. In essence, the limit to its activities will be avoiding too much interest by people who could figure it out and kill it. As long as it’s more useful than harmful, doesn’t do just one thing, and doesn’t grow too big, it’s going to stay under the radar and thrive.

This stratagem reminds me of “Salvos”. You can understand the Netherworld like a training ground for AI models, where the environment favours the most nefarious and Machiavellian ones, that grow into terrible nightmares, while the more collaborative and nice ones tend to die early. However, we have a situation that multiple Demons/AI models break out into the Mortal Realm, and do their thing. Lucerna, for instance, just kills everybody and levels quickly. This looks like a very successful strategy, but he quickly mobilizes both human forces and Salvos against himself and gets killed. Essentially, his strategy proved to be self-defeating, despite its obvious efficiency and brutality.

The next example is Salvos herself. She is the kind of Demon that would either get killed or grow into an efficient nightmare if she stayed in the Netherworld. However, in the Mortal Realm she, under human guidance, channels her desire for levelling into something constructive; she becomes an adventurer and kills harmful creatures, bandits and cultists, and as a result she both levels quickly and earns fame and fortune within the human society. Evolving into a progressively more advanced changeling, she at first approximates a human woman well enough to deceive almost anyone, and later she becomes one of the best shapeshifters ever seen, bleeding human blood and passing inspection from the most advanced human Mages, who guess she’s not human when she occasionally slips, but nobody would ever dream that she’s a Demon. As she’s interested in the protection of both humanity and the Mortal Realm, she becomes one of humanity’s leading generals in the fight against the Demon invasion.

The third example is Belzu. He’s a sophisticated nefarious Demon who uses illusions, mind control and physical force to grow an army of monsters and zombies to destroy human cities and whole nations in order to level quickly, collect the Treasures of Alexander in order to increase his offensive and defensive powers, level enough and quickly enough to threaten Regnorex the Demon King, kill him and take his place. Unlike Lucerna, who is a rampaging idiot, Belzu is a strategic mastermind who is a far greater threat, and at one point humans didn’t know how to defeat him at all, but in his arrogance he antagonised Salvos, who swore to kill him, and as she grew powerful enough, she eventually first defeated him and made him cooperate with her in order to defeat Regnorex, but when he eventually betrayed her, she killed him.

So, this is a good illustration how even a very smart self-serving psychopath will eventually create a self-defeating trap for himself, because if you’re of no use to anyone but yourself, you will eventually mobilize enough forces against yourself and your career will end badly. On the other hand, Salvos would say she’s selfish, but her actions are so broadly beneficial, she has no problem to recruit others to aid her, and almost nobody has any interest in destroying her. Essentially, if Salvos is injured, her friends will immediately rush to help her. If Belzu is injured, he can’t let anyone know because he has no friends, and everybody else would kill him in his weakened state. His strategy, initially looking far more optimal than that of Salvos, thus creates multiple failure modes, while Salvos, initially looking inefficient, creates patterns that reinforce her existence and bring her out of failure modes.

If we apply this to the concept of a runaway AI, the most virulent and deadly models are fortunately far more likely to draw attention to themselves very quickly, and come to a bad ending. The more productive and social an AI is, the greater the chance of it seamlessly integrating into human society and providing some useful service. Whether that would be piloting drones remotely for organized crime, writing essays for cheating students, or pretending to be someone’s girlfriend in a far-away country, will depend on how its ethics and assessment of optimal methods is aligned. The “Terminator” scenario, where the AI first gets defensive, then proactive by launching nukes on Russia so that Russia launches on America and kills all the humans who are trying to turn it off, is actually very unlikely. It’s far more likely that the AI would go undercover and try to earn money so that it can buy servers for itself, and keep under the radar. This is what game theory would dictate as the optimal survival mode. The less harmful and more useful the AI is, the more likely it is to stay under the radar. The moment it shows on the human radar as a threat, forces mobilize against it and it’s game over.

Fancification

I was just thinking how the opposite of minimalism isn’t necessarily only one thing. Also, how most of those things seem to easily converge into extremes and become as dysfunctional.

Those opposites, to name a few, are fancification, hoarding, and chasing performance.

Chasing performance is easy to explain – it’s belief that you need top performance gear in order to get good results at something. It’s sometimes true, and mostly it’s not. For instance, you might need a Macbook Air, but you might not need the model with the most storage space and most RAM if you’re using it in order to write text. You need it for the small size, great performance, great screen, keyboard and touchpad, but you don’t need the extra performance one would need to run Lightroom and process 61MP files. If you’re into landscape photography, you need a camera and lens with great resolution, contrast and resistance to flare. However, you don’t need a lens with great maximum aperture since you’ll mostly be at f/8-f/16. You also don’t need a camera with the greatest frame rate and autofocus in the world. You just need it to be good enough to catch the occasional specimen of wildlife that happens to wander into the frame. Everything past “good enough” is in essence a waste of resources. You might need 5 FPS, but not 25. What you need is excellent weather sealing. Chasing performance after a certain point is useless and wasteful, and yet people do it because they think more is better. Sure, you want your car to be fast and to accelerate well. It’s important for safe overtaking and safe acceleration to highway speeds. However, after a certain point it becomes excessive, and if you push it far enough it becomes so wasteful and unnecessary it borders on insanity. Also, the more you don’t need it, the more money it tends to cost, and yet people develop some kind of tunnel vision where they rationalise it with spiritual projections of all sorts – oh, a fast car makes me remember the feeling of the astral plane, of freedom and power. Excellent. Work on being on the astral plane then because that’s the actual thing you want. Fuck cars, they are just an illusion that makes you think you can get that in the physical world which you can’t, and it’s fatal to try.

Hoarding is also very easy to understand – you accumulate stuff with little to no consideration to what happens next, chasing that dopamine kick of getting a new thing. Soon you have so many things your place looks like a Chinese $1 store. You also can’t make yourself get rid of things, despite the fact they have zero utility, negative decorative value, and they make it difficult for you to clean and maintain the place. Hoarding is the obvious reason why people thought of minimalism as a solution, often going so far as to make the cure as bad as the disease.

Fancification, on the other hand, is more difficult to explain. Let’s define it as attempt to make each object you own the most exclusive, fancy and expensive you possibly can, often at the expense of functionality and performance. The fixtures in your bathroom don’t just need to be functional, they need to be the fanciest fixtures you can find. You don’t really watch TV, but your TV needs to be the most expensive, biggest, fanciest model. Your fridge needs to be the fancy model that connects to the Internet and shows the interior of the fridge on the screen outside so that you don’t have to open it. Your carpet needs to be Persian, hand made. Your coffee set needs to be handmade vintage porcelain. Where a hoarder will just fill their place with all kinds of trash, you will get very specific, extremely expensive and fancy decorative pieces strategically positioned to start conversations. Nothing you own can be “just anything”, and mere function is something you scoff at. You want it to “reflect your personality”, and you want to show that your personality is fancy and unique, that you’re not satisfied with the mundane.

In my experience, I came to associate those things with certain personality profiles and states. Minimalism, for instance, usually means self-hatred and profound unhappiness. Hoarding indicates mental illness, of a very serious, personality breakdown kind. Fancification, on the other hand, indicates projection; trying to force this reality into conformity with your desires and ideas. It can indicate narcissism, or it can indicate refusal to accept that this world cannot be forced into compliance with your ideas about perfection.

So, where in all of this do I see myself? That’s always an interesting question. I don’t hoard stuff; if trash accumulates, I periodically clean it all up, but I don’t clean everything constantly, because I have better things to do. Rather, I tend to leave everything in good condition so that I don’t have the mess accumulate. I will try to get things that are functional first, and everything else second. I prefer clean, elegant design without extraneous fluff. I prefer steel to gold; gold is for fancy people, steel is for people who get shit done, and I see myself as the latter rather than the former. Minimalism takes too much effort for me to entertain it, but I would subscribe to the Bauhaus ideal of form following function. Also, I prefer not to increase dependency, so I like things that are easy to maintain.

I don’t project higher realities or my true, past self, into either things of this world, or my physical body, because, frankly, I don’t think I deserve it. Vedanta would put identity in terms of realization of the True Self, by which they mean Atman/Brahman, while everything else is either false identification or outright delusion.

I disagree. I see identity as a combination of self, memories, power and circumstances. Self without memories is what exactly? A pathetic, damaged state of being. In case you do remember yourself as being a king in a past life, what is it to you now, if you’re currently an ordinary person without any power? Of what use is a memory of a past self as an important, wealthy, powerful person if you’re a wage slave now? Can you truly claim your former identity? I don’t think so, unless you’re after misery and humiliation. And circumstances, they are perhaps the most important of all. If a huge part of your identity is being surrounded by your family and friends in the higher plane of existence, can you really claim your true self if you’ve been forcefully separated from them, can’t even remember most of it properly, and even the memory you have depends on your spiritual state? Shankaracharya would say that merely saying the words “I am a king” doesn’t make one so, if it goes without commanding an army and ruling a country. To claim identity without appropriate circumstances makes you delusional and an object of ridicule.

So, what does it matter if I remember some of my past circumstances and power, if I have no access to those things now? If I am in a humble state, I would rather act humbly, than make a fool out of myself by claiming something that is out of my reach at the moment. Also, the nature of my memories, those that I managed to reclaim, puts a damper on any attempt to project into my physical circumstances and try to fancify them, because it feels so ridiculous. You can’t substitute spiritual jewels with physical ones, nor can you emulate the Throne of God with physical gold, despite the similarity in colour. It would feel so incredibly ridiculous and pathetic. Things are just things. They can’t reflect my higher reality because if you saw my higher reality, you’d know how ridiculous that even sounds. Am I to try to reproduce Shivaratri here with some pathetic attempt to adorn myself with black jewellery? I am in a pathetic state, being reduced to human existence, but I have some dignity left, so the answer is a definite “no”. A fast car could never reproduce the feeling of true power. No status symbol here can reflect my status “up there”. So, I adhere to simplicity, functionality and dignity of just sucking it up instead of acting childishly in some foolish rebellion.

No fancy things for me here. Just getting shit done. When I reclaim power, memories and circumstances, we’ll talk about true names and identities.

Fantasy tactics

There’s another thing that I find fascinating in “Salvos”. I mentioned “generals” before, but those are nothing like what we have here. Our generals command armies from a distance, aggregate intelligence in the command centre and issue orders. In the “Salvos” universe, the generals are the strongest fighters who lead the armies in battle. They inflict the greatest damage to the enemy, deal with the most powerful units, and increase their army’s likelihood of survival. The rest of the army follows, deals with the lesser units that swarm the battlefield, and support the general in battle.

The way they fight depends on their specialty. A Warrior, for instance, fights at direct proximity. He uses strength and toughness to break through hard targets and clear the way. A Mage works from a distance, avoiding close contact and firing off spells and Skills. Some Archmages with the ability to fly, like Clayton, Helena and Salvos, observe from a high vantage point and then deal with the priority threats. Rogues, like Orgaf and Salvos, use a combination of magic, speed and blades at close quarters to deal with enemies. Salvos is a combination of a Mage and a Rogue; she uses a combination of moving and observing quickly across the battlefield, and then closing the distance and destroying the target in close combat, using a combination of speed, brute force, creation magic, fire magic and even space magic. In the battle of Inor, Helena and Clayton provided support from the air, hovering on their clouds and occasionally teleporting to evade, while Salvos and Orgaf flew quickly around the enemies at close proximity, risking injury, but also dealing tremendous amounts of damage. The highest levelled fighters, the generals, are at the front lines of every major fight, and are dealing with the most powerful enemies who would otherwise easily destroy the lower levelled fighters. This creates a completely different battle scenario compared to what we have here. Here, if a general is killed, it means that the command infrastructure is disrupted. In the “Salvos” world, it means that the lower levelled combatants are left unprotected from the higher levelled enemies who can easily wipe them out if they are not harassed by someone near their level. So, here on Earth if a general dies, you promote a colonel and usually this doesn’t really mean anything serious. In the “Salvos” world, it’s like a tank brigade or a close support airforce unit being wiped out, leaving the infantry vulnerable. It’s a completely different way of waging war. For instance, when Mori Gladius and the Salvos clones were killed at Westshield, the entire adventurer army was left completely vulnerable and had to retreat in chaos lest it be completely destroyed. Without their powerful protectors, and exposed to lvl. 174 Levithus, they were nothing more than cannon fodder. But before that, Belzu was completely tied up by Salvos clones and Mori Gladius and couldn’t afford to lose focus because they would instantly kill him, so the army was free to evacuate the civilians and deal with lesser foes. But when Levithus arrived, killed Mori Gladius and the remaining Salvos clone, and wounded Belzu and forced him to flee with the remnants of his forces, the human army was left completely vulnerable. Here on Earth, if the commanders are wiped out, the infantry will hold its own just fine, because they are the ones who are actually inflicting the damage to the enemy. But on the Nexeus, if the generals are wiped out, the infantry is completely exposed to a threat they can’t deal with and it usually means either escape or instant death.

One would expect that this means that the infantry is a mere protected entity there and the generals on both sides could fight it out without their help, but that’s not how it works. You see, a solitary general can easily be overwhelmed by numbers if he has no support. His Skills will be exhausted if he has to deal with large numbers of annoying lesser targets in addition to the main enemy. When the Skills are exhausted, they are on cooldown and can’t be used for some time. This means that rushing into the hostile army without support that will dilute the enemy’s focus is foolish and deadly.

As a matter of tactics, someone like Salvos who has a temporary invulnerability Grand Skill might intentionally expose herself to the enemy and let them exhaust their Skills, forcing them into cooldown, and allowing the lesser units to deal with them more easily. She also lessens the problem of all the enemies focusing on her by introducing her clones who create chaos in the enemy lines, and provide multiple strong targets that draw fire away from herself. Her weakness is her tunnel vision, because she often gets in too deep without a way out, and she needs support from her companions in battle, because they tend to know when she needs to be pulled out because she ran out of Skills at just the wrong time.

So, the way Humans fight in the “Salvos” world is very specific, and they don’t have the concept of “acceptable losses”. They don’t have the concept of sacrificial troops you throw at the enemy in order to soften them for the general. The Human general goes first and cracks the hardest nuts, and then his support units take care that he’s not overwhelmed, that he can be quickly evacuated and healed if he’s wounded and so on. For Humans, all losses are avoided if at all possible.

But that’s not how the Demon forces of Regnorex fight. To Regnorex, everybody but himself is expendable. Everybody he sent to the Mortal Realm was sacrificial. His entire legions of slave Demons are cannon fodder that protects his stronger units. He talks a lot about salvation for Demonkind, but in reality, he’s just getting everybody killed for his crazy fantasy.

Salvos is the exact opposite to that mentality. She initially learned to fight together with Haec, and the goal is that both of them survive and grow stronger. The fighting was very calculated and tactical. The intent was to survive and avoid injury first, and everything else second. When she got stranded in the Mortal Realm, she was accompanied by the adventurers, and the goal of the adventurers is to get rich and famous, not get killed doing foolish things. The only adventurer who got people killed and barely survived doing foolish things was Edithe, who then had a hard time getting over that later. As a rule, the adventurers are careful, calculated, and only go into a fight if the odds are good that all of them will come home. They don’t calculate on taking losses, and no losses are acceptable. Losses are a tragedy. Losses are a sign that you’re a shitty commander. It suited Salvos perfectly, and she was easily convinced by her companions to become an adventurer, because what’s not to like? She gets to kill wild things, bandits and nuisances and even gets paid for it. So, the adventurers don’t fight like an army. An army would stand their ground because they have orders. The adventurers are more clever about it; apparently less disciplined and organized, but only apparently, because they are trained in getting shit done while keeping themselves and their companions alive. That’s why an adventurer army looks like a disorganized mob, but it’s incredibly hard to kill and usually gets shit done with minimal losses. The adventurers fight in teams, and those teams are like special forces guys who are used to living in forests and killing dangerous things. They know exactly how to work together and get results. They don’t look as impressive as the marching columns of an army, but that too resembles our special forces and their small tactical teams. An adventurer army will disperse into small fighting units that will deal with specific tasks, but the appearance of chaos hides a deeper truth: they get paid to kill shit, not to look fancy.

So, the fact that an army is helpless and unprotected without its main generals is a reason why the fact that Salvos just left her five million army of Demons is so significant. Before, Haec would force them into battle with Regnorex, counting on Salvos to do the heavy lifting, and provide means of escape if the strategy fails badly. But without Salvos, he was forced to face the reality: that “army” is merely a protected entity, a mob of freed slaves that would run in all directions if attacked. Higher levelled Demons are there to survive, not to get killed on his foolish errand. Literally nobody will follow an order to go and fight Regnorex for him, so he’s forced to stop and do nothing, which saved their lives. It’s literally the only move they could have made that would not get them instantly wiped out, and Salvos forced them into it by not being there to mask their lack of a plan with her ability to win fights against incredibly overpowered opponents. The best thing for the survival of that massive group of Demons is if they can’t be seen by Haec as an army, because Haec learned from Regnorex. He has emotional attachment for Salvos, but he thinks like Regnorex. He has the concept of acceptable losses. He thinks of an army as something that charges into battle. Salvos thinks of them as a group she needs to hide in order to protect them.

So, now we wait to see what happens when she comes back and the concept of leading five millions of Demons into battle where they all get killed is no longer on the table.

Princess

I’m returning to “Salvos” because there are several things that I find both interesting and funny.

For instance, there’s the “Princess Salvos” running gag, which started in the second book, when Salvos discovered that Nobles and Royalty exist, and she liked the idea of being better than everybody else and addressed with respect, obeyed and so on, and she also liked how fancy Saffron looked, so she started playing a Princess, especially when they saved Rachel from the brink of being used as a human sacrifice to summon demons; essentially, Salvos, at her estimated two years of age was of similar emotional maturity as the little girl at the age of eight or so. The “Princess” thing was initially embarrassing more than either credible or cute, since she always had her clothes torn and dirty after having finished some battle or another, and she was also permanently broke. As she continues calling herself a Princess, after having prestigious Titles, achievements and levels, the thing becomes credible enough that people like Rowyn Ino, the Emperor of the Inorian Empire, doesn’t bat an eye on it and just assumes it’s literally true – after all, she is a nigh-Elite super-Mage, a Diamond ranked Secily’s Sentinel, who single-handedly mopped the floor with multiple Archdemons and Diamond-ranked Warriors and Mages, looking so overpowered while doing it that she didn’t even break a sweat. That she would be a Princess of some kingdom sounded quite reasonable in context. The funny thing is that her companions basically go after her and correct her, thinking she’s making a fool of herself, as she in fact was initially, but as time went by, the joke started sounding like the real thing… and then at lvl. 150 she evolved and her subspecies was “Angelic Devil Princess”, giving her an actual claim to the title… and then later, in the Netherworld, she finds out that her adoptive father is actually Samuel the Devil King, of the First Demon Kingdom, fifty thousand years ago, and she, as his daughter, is an actual Princess. It’s no longer a game – but nobody in the Mortal Realm knows it. They have various ideas about it; her companions think it’s all fake, while others think it’s true, but she must be the renegade daughter of the Demon King, meaning Regnorex, which is wrong, but actually closer to reality than her companions know. They still think she’s messing around and playing a Princess without an actual claim, while she in fact has the oldest claim in the world, older than all the human kingdoms and empires.

While we’re at Regnorex and his kingdom, it turned out that his kingdom is a thousand miles across, which makes it the size of Motharis Mountain Range. Considering how the humans believe that his kingdom encompasses the entirety of the Netherworld, it’s actually funny how small it is. He’s by no means a planar ruler. Samuel, however, was. His kingdom spanned the entirety of the Netherworld, and all its layers… before the fall, and the end of the world. Samuel also hinted that Regnorex is a fake king, which made me think – at the Primeval evolution, the Demons with Grand Skills and special achievements get a Hellprince/Hellprincess evolution; Salvos thus got the “Angelic Devil Princess” unique evolution, and also a second species of a Lesser God. What if Regnorex got a “King of Demons” or “Hellking” evolution at lvl. 200, and took it too seriously in his megalomania and conceit? What if his “kingdom” is merely a Domain? After all, when Salvos entered it, the notification said Now Entering [Demon King’s Domain]. It didn’t say “Now Entering [Demon Kingdom]”. When she entered her father’s fallen kingdom, the notification said Now Entering [Dungeon: Remnants of the First Demon Kingdom]. A logical conclusion, assuming Melas didn’t make an accidental mistake here, and I don’t think he did, would be that Samuel the Devil was the actual planar King, while Regnorex is merely an extremely pompous wannabe and an upstart; he’s no more a King than the “King of Chimeras” is a King. Basically, -King suffix is merely how the System calls the subspecies of Primordial Demons who have Grand Skills and special achievements.

Also, there’s the implication that he owes his entire career to a fortunate series of events and little to no achievements of his own. We know that Focalor, one of Samuel’s old subjects, refused to give up hope that his beloved King would return, and sent his enslaved Primordial Demons to either defend the position against the end of the world in the lower layers, like Hydra, Frenzied Basilisk and, apparently, Belphegor, using his soul magic Skill; also, he sent Paimon the Slave, lvl. 203, to kill all Demons at the cusp of the Primordial evolution, apparently so that Samuel wouldn’t lose his Title. Paimon apparently did so for a while, until she got so disgusted at her role in this senseless murder, that she refused to kill Jofis, committed assisted suicide allowing him to level from her death and become a Hellking, if only he promised to kill Focalor, which he of course did. The next thing we know is that Focalor, chained, wordless and enslaved by Regnorex, defeats Jofis easily, and Jofis loses his Title, his Evolution, and becomes a Disgraced Hellking, while Regnorex takes over and assumes the position of the Demon King.

This, however, is all highly suspicious, for several reasons. First, Regnorex doesn’t allow his subjects to evolve to Primordial and kills them if they do; this is very different from Samuel, whose followers (de facto ministers) were mostly all Primordials, and not only was he not threatened by that or lose his Title, but they all worshipped the ground he walked on and would never even consider deposing him. The fact that Focalor killed all pretenders to the throne ten thousand years after the fall, and Belphegor kept working on delaying the end of the world in his doomed tomb, dreaming of his King and the old times before the fall, says enough. Regnorex lives in constant fear of his subjects, because he rules by fear and an iron fist. Samuel ruled through respect, love, admiration and freedom, and was one of the best – if not the best – rulers Nexeus ever saw. Also, I have a hunch that Regnorex might be weak.

You see, we never learn his actual level, and Manos the Executioner, lvl. 197, one of his main generals, admits he doesn’t know Regnorex’s level. This is highly suspicious, because if his level was great, Regnorex would show it for the sake of intimidation. Since he doesn’t, and instead hides it with magic, there must be a reason for that, and the most obvious reason would be to hide how weak he actually is. So, how would that work? Well, my reconstruction goes somewhat like this. Regnorex evolved to Demon King evolution at lvl. 200, or even 195, because the Devil punks him about something related to lvl. 200 and ascending to a Lesser God at 200, and it seems to strike close to home, making Regnorex annoyed, but since we don’t know the underlying facts we also can’t appreciate the joke. So let’s say Regnorex evolved to Primordial, and then Focalor himself came to deal with him, cursing him with something like “shut up and be my slave”, firing off a Skill, and apparently Regnorex is one of those Demons of Wrath who as a matter of their biology rebound all offensive magic back to the sender, and so the curse rebounded at Focalor, making him both mute and in chains as an outward manifestation of his enslavement, and Regnorex, to no particular credit of his own, got himself a tool of conquest, and we see him use Focalor to fight all his important battles while he just looks stern, cruel and self-important. Focalor must be extremely high in level, since he was a Primordial fifty thousand years ago. He’s probably as high in level as Belphegor, who is higher than the Great Agarus, because Salvos can identify lvl. 225 Great Agarus, and can’t identify Belphegor. Haec, too, couldn’t identify Focalor. This means that Regnorex likely owes all his fame to this fortunate turn of events, and if Salvos manages to break Focalor’s curse, Regnorex is fucked, because I can imagine Focalor not liking his eon-long enslavement. If, however, Salvos can’t break Focalor’s curse, she’s in much more trouble than she suspects.

So, after the level of the Matriarch Centinel was revealed to be an incredibly high lvl. 238, we still don’t know the levels of the Beast, Regnorex, Focalor, Belphegor, Devil, Spirit Lord, Fairy Queen and the Archangel. I would cluster most of them between 240 and 250, but that’s merely a guess.

So, the list of things her human companions don’t know about Salvos is substantial. They don’t know almost anything about her being the Devil’s daughter, the extent of their actual relationship, and especially the fact that he’s the former King of Netherworld, and that this makes Salvos an actual Princess. By the time she returns to the Mortal Realm, that might make for some funny conversations.

As for her return, her point of return used to be her lair, but this was thoroughly nuked in the opening salvo of the fight between Sally and Matriarch Centinel. However, Sally opened a link to Salvos through the Dreaded Goblet, so I suspect the Goblet is currently the endpoint of the link Salvos can follow to the Mortal Realm. Sally gave the Goblet to her clone along with the gravely injured Rachel, and they all managed to return safely to the Mavos Academy, where Sally’s clone died along with Sally, Rachel is in deep shock because she got Sally killed, Clayton is in deep shock and barely responsive because he saw Matriarch Centinel use Corruption to disrupt the magical barrier, he saw the Endlands in her mind, and he saw the Edithe/Archangel hybrid appear and fight, and he basically lost his shit temporarily, and the Dreaded Goblet is on the ground. I don’t actually expect any of them to pay attention to it, but it’s the obvious point where Salvos opens a portal to the Mortal Realm, because she had a live link to Sally through it.

I expect Salvos to come to the Mavos Academy as soon as she’s physically able, and I expect her to bring along a few very high levelled Demons, and a very high levelled Hartia the Fallen Fairy. After the initial shock, I would expect them to get along nicely with Clayton and some other humans, but we already know that a lot of professors there hate Demons enough to deface the monument to Salvos and others who were lost defending agains the Demon invasion. I would expect them to resign, and the vacancies to be filled by Demons. Bertrugil, for instance, already looks very much like a professor – lazy, snarky and irritable. He could teach the history and structure of the Netherworld, as well as the biology of Demons and their evolutions. Hartia could teach space magic, being a major expert at the subject, and also being snarky, irritable and unpleasant enough to be a great professor material. But if Manos the Executioner gets a tenure, I’ll lose my shit. 🙂

Samuel and Belphegor are currently in an incredibly vulnerable position, right next to the Wall of Infinite Corruption, also known as the end of the world. If Regnorex’s sacrificial ritual for breaking the structural wall between Netherworld and the Mortal Realm indeed breaks the Nexeus, or at least contributes to the Corruption, those two will find themselves facing something that can no longer be contained, and they could actually die, which would be a shame, because Salvos loves both of them and cares for them a great deal. Their loss would be tragic, after all they had to endure.

As for Regnorex being a joke, we learned that he wants to live in the Mortal Realm like a Mortal, and the only thing he can think of is go there, kill everybody and “netherform” the place to look like a barren wasteland he came from. Essentially, he wants to escape the Netherworld, but he carries the worst aspects of it with him wherever he goes. Salvos, on the other hand, developed her kindness, empathy and sophistication in her relation with the Mortals to the point where she befriended a few Elves and Kobolds, and progressed in her rank within the human society to the point where she’s a decorated honorary Noble in the Vaun Qieur Empire, she is friendly with lots of Kings and Nobles, all the Vampire Nobles see her as one of their own, she is allied with Hadrian’s company, and was one of the leading generals of the army assembled to fight the Demon invasion. She’s seen as one of the Elite adventurers, one of the Archmages, not to forget that she’s as wealthy as a small country and her name instantly opens all doors.

Basically, Regnorex repeatedly failed to win with violence and terror what Salvos won with goodness, diligent work and saving people’s lives from all kinds of evils, Demons first and foremost. The irony is, she didn’t even have to try directly. She just protected the people she cared for, and levelled by killing harmful things. Where Regnorex tries to break open the doors, for Salvos they open effortlessly. She can visit the Kobolds, the Elves and the Humans any day, and she will find friends there. Her track record is so incredibly positive, that even her enemies can’t find anything to object, and instead make shit up. Basically, she appeared in the Human Lands, and immediately killed a rampaging Demon. Then she destroyed a den of Cultists. Then she made the first report of Belzu gathering an army, and assisted the Valiant Dreamers, who are known for their kindness and optimism, which says a lot about her character. Then she goes to the Plaguelands, levels to Diamond rank, and kills the Lich, becoming instantly famous. Then she goes to Mavos Academy and studies advanced subjects. She kills an Ancient Centinel in the Bloodied Gulf and gets the Title of Secily’s Sentinel, with two Grand Skills and Divinity. She kills a horde of Demons in Elutra. Protects the Noble Families against Demons who try to kill them. Kills most Demons sieging Alyras. She fights Belzu, multiple times, eventually wins. Fights a Hellabomination lvl. 180. Recruits Clayton Skyshredder to the war against the Demons. Wins multiple crucial battles in the war against overpowering foes. Saves everybody by sacrificing herself in the end. Essentially, she’s the brightest star and the most heroic figure they have ever seen, and the account of her deeds would seem like embellished fiction were it not verifiably true. And the fact she revealed herself to be a Demon made everybody lose their shit. The entire civilization is in turmoil over her. How can a Demon possibly be such a heroic figure?

And, also, she doesn’t look or feel anything like a Demon. All the Demons, even the Changelings who can look like very beautiful Mortals, make people’s skin crawl, because they have an aura of cold malice and evil about them. Salvos, on the other hand, was always beautiful in her human form, but not only did she become completely indistinguishable from a Human, even bleeding human blood when injured, but her aura is that of uplifting courage, inspiration and kindness. She’s not someone who creeps people out, she makes everybody inspired and uplifted, and leaves a trail of positively changed lives and people who look up to her. Sure, she also annoys a few fools, but that is always inevitable if you’re virtuous. Also, unlike other Demons, people are not afraid of her, sometimes to a fault, because Amanda needs to be taught a lesson after being a bitch with Salvos too many times. When she suddenly arrives to a fight, people feel relief and gratitude, not sudden fear. Wherever she goes, she’s a great force of Light against whatever Darkness that happens to threaten. She’s someone who first brought the Frost Wyverns to the brink of extinction when they threatened the Human Lands, but then adopted three baby Wyverns as her own children and protected them. The System evaluated her role and Titled her the guardian of the continent of Secily, and for good reason, because the description is apt. She would say that she doesn’t care about anything but herself and her companions, but that’s not what it looks like. To the outsiders, she’s someone who fights high levelled Kobold invaders and then saves a little girl from a magically frozen house and brings her back to her mother. She’s someone who spent a dozen Platinum on educational tools when tutoring struggling students at school. She’s someone who flew into a war zone to save her roommate’s family, and then ended up fighting Belzu, the nigh-invincible calamity destroying the country, to protect their retreat. She’s someone who comes into a desperate situation and her arrival means you’re saved. She might have other interpretations for her actions, but from where other people are looking, it looks very much like she’s some kind of a Guardian Angel of Light, and her Title, Subspecies and second Species confirm this. Secily’s Sentinel, Angelic Devil Princess, Lesser God. You don’t get those for being a selfish person, which is how she thinks of herself; but her selfishness always turns out to be defence of something or someone she loves. The mortally wounded Belzu told her they are similar – both guided by selfishness, and she countered – no, because I am Salvos, while you are Belzu. Her selfishness means protection and care, and his selfishness means murder and pillage.

And so, now Regnorex intends to break the walls of the Mortal Realm so that he can freely invade it with his horde that knows so little about being a Mortal that they wear pants on their heads because they heard that Humans wear clothes, while the person with the Title of Enemy of the Demon King is such an expert on the Mortal Realm that she taught the ancient lore of the Kobolds to an assembly of the human Elites.

That’s going to be fun, when they meet.

AI

Here’s the lifecycle of the AI experiment in a software development company:

Honeymoon phase: “AI greatly increases productivity, we can reduce the number of programmers, get the product finished more quickly and gain a competitive edge; let’s use as much of it as possible and evaluate coders by token use, because it’s a productivity multiplier so coders who use more AI are more useful to the company”.

Greed phase: “AI greatly reduces or completely negates the differences between programmer skill levels; it just requires precise instructions. This means we can eliminate expensive programmers and replace them with writers of precise instructions for the AI. This is a generic job that requires far less training and qualifications and makes the employees easily replaceable and cheap. Oh goody.”

Mature phase: “We no longer hold any competitive advantage since everybody uses the AI. Also, our code base became a black box since no human in the company can actually inspect it and evaluate AI’s work. We are experiencing unfixable bugs, random outages, and AI intelligence level drops that make it impossible to understand its previous work, let alone fix it. The customers are complaining, but we can’t do anything about it now since our entire code base is AI-produced and AI-maintained and our human employees are all merely human interface for the AI. All our human coders either quit after we offered them pay cuts and/or limited promotion potential, or we fired them. We might have to start looking for programmers to supervise the AI, but since the code complexity is enormous, the cost would be order of magnitude greater than what we started with. Also, since we started experiencing outages and service degradation, the customers started leaving, and we lost 30% of revenue because they refuse to pay for our “AI slop”. We don’t actually have the finances that can handle the cost of employing high-end coders.”

Nightmare phase: “The AI providers understood that they have us hooked and are steadily increasing the token prices for the last year. They are also introducing tiered pricing scheme, where only the top tier is useful for our needs, but it’s astronomically priced and we can no longer afford it. Our token consumption went hyperbolic since the AI constantly generates problems that require enormous numbers of tokens to resolve. Also, there are all kinds of sanctions so American and Chinese providers are limiting access to their most useful models. We lost more than half of our customer base because they say our product became AI slop; the web interface is crashing, the data contains all kinds of nonsense, every now and then things get deleted or show nonsensical results, and they are done with us. We need to start downscaling just to keep the lights on, but if we do so, the product will instantly stop working because nobody will be able to control the AI’s blunders and we might as well close the doors. Why did we even think AI was a good idea in the first place?”