Darshan

What does it feel like? I know people think about it when I describe darshan, especially if they haven’t experienced it themselves.

It depends, you know. Depends on who it is – which person of God; depends on whether you know each other already and have an established relationship from before. Depends on what they are there for – to warn, to ask, to teach, to comfort.

But if I had to generalize, I’d say it feels like being restored to your true self. I usually have all sorts of anxieties and stress around me when I’m spending karmic matter. It feels like taking other people’s sin, but in atomic form, so it’s not a coherent thing. When I spend it, I feel pain, and I mentally repeat “I’m sorry”, without knowing exactly what I’m sorry for, because it’s too fragmented and garbled to carry any kind of information, but I’m sincere regardless. But after being immersed in that for some time, it feels terrible. I’m no longer sure of anything, because everything in my consciousness was sin, suffering and remorse for days, weeks, months… sometimes years. If it’s years, I no longer know whether it’s karmic transformation or have I been lost, fallen and rejected by God, and I can always think of reasons and rationalisations, and this anxiety makes me focus, makes me try to do everything right, cross every t and dot every i. I can’t tell what God thinks about what I’m doing, but I can at least try to do everything properly, trusting in what I remember of the truth that I saw, when I saw it, long ago, and trusting it’s still the same, that nothing changed; but I don’t know. I’m never sure, and this uncertainty is amplified by the pain and remorse and suffering of karmic transformation.

And when I am in the presence of God, it’s always sudden, without any fanfare or introduction, or announcement. One moment there’s only myself and the misery of what I’m processing, and the next moment there is a presence, and the quality of that presence is like having a long, sharp thorn removed from my body – all the anxiety, the uncertainty, not knowing what God would say, what he would think about things I had to do in the mean time, about the terrible condition I’m in because of all that stuff I’m processing – it all vanishes instantly, because I know. Sometimes I feel information being passed, and sometimes not, but the presence itself is a truth of a higher order, and it makes me know things without words or thoughts.

What can you know without words or thoughts? Well, I can know that I worried for no reason. If my old friend still sees me the same way, it means this shit didn’t really stick to me, it didn’t corrupt me, change me into something He would not want to be associated with. There’s that sense of being with someone who was there with you before the world, before the stars, before all those things people assume were forever here, but we remember them being born or made. It’s the sense of just being there and knowing that if one of us needs to go to hell to deal with some business, the other will watch his back, in such a serious and dedicated way that he’ll have absolutely nothing better to do until I’m safely out. That’s what Lord Vishnu feels like, to me. There are limits to what He can do here. However, the feeling of His presence alone tells enough – to Him, it doesn’t matter that I’m dying under a terrible burden, that I’m all shades of fucked up, deprived of power, memories and my true being, trying to feel through darkness and remember who I am. He knows who I am, and He treats me as if I’m my old self, in my full power, with all the stuff I can’t even remember properly now. He doesn’t treat me any differently – He’s the same as when we had coffee up there, before the world. In a sense, He’s the complete opposite to how humans treat me; they see my limitations and barely anything beyond them, and think I can’t amount to much. He sees much more of me than I can even guess in this state, and shrugs the limitations off as incidental and irrelevant. No words exchanged, but all of it is felt, and the effect is profoundly restorative and healing. Just that feeling that He remembers me in my complete form, and this here – He understands it, and understands what will be when it passes, and looks forward to us having that coffee.

That’s what it feels like.

Obviously

I am aware of the fact that I upset some people by very clearly suggesting that most things practiced under the collective umbrella term of spirituality are, in no unclear terms, delusion and fakery, while others are genuine but modest achievements.

Yes; when I was a beginner myself, I thought every person with a spiritual-sounding title and an orange robe is enlightened, everybody talking about spiritual experiences is genuine, every “spiritual book” is genuinely inspired or at least useful, and so on. That was before 1997, when I started experiencing things that were completely unexpected and for which I had no theoretical framework in anything I’ve read or experienced before.

Before, it seemed logical that all the enlightened people are basically saying the same things, in essentially the same terms, and that their experiences confirm what they were taught. It seemed logical – if it’s true, of course it’s confirmed by experience. Since my own experiences confirmed the same things, I considered myself one of them – one of people who experienced the truth.

But as my experiences started to diverge wildly from anything others talked about, I became cautious. It took me a long time to actually change the theoretical framework, because I wanted to be sure it’s true, and that takes time, especially when you’re not copying anyone’s homework.

Now, I am very skeptical of people whose spiritual experiences confirm what they were taught, word by word; the entire dogma. That’s just not how things work when you’re based in reality, like I was. It took me decades to even interpret some experiences properly, that’s how radically they departed from everything I thought I knew.

That answers the next question people have: how come I’m the only one talking about certain things, such as Sanat Kumar, or this world being a weaponised VR, God manifesting as multiple persons, manifestation as a person of God being the goal of personal evolution, and so on? The answer is as simple as it is uncomfortable. No, in fact I’m not the only one talking about those things. There were others before me who figured it out. It’s just that there were so few of us throughout history. All the “spiritual authorities” you know of? Yeah, they are saying the same things I was saying for the first few years into my sadhana. That’s because they are where I was for the first few years of practice. However, I moved on; they haven’t. They didn’t transcend the first phases of understanding, and are basically regurgitating what they were taught and copy-pasting traditional teachings. They had some spiritual experiences. That’s all fine. But there’s more; much more.

The true meaning of the question isn’t that what I’m saying is surprising; it’s that people underestimate who I am by multiple orders of magnitude, and then their questions make sense. If you know who I am, the reason why I’m the only one who managed to understand certain things here becomes blatantly obvious.

I got some things because I remembered them, and that was possible because I was there. Why others didn’t? Obviously, they weren’t there. They couldn’t remember the cat in their lap playing with the pendant around their neck, or that special tone of consciousness of their friends; they weren’t there. Those people aren’t their friends. They were probably born eons later. I can remember how Sanat Kumar got the Jewel, because I was there, and it’s my fault, in a way. There are, let’s see, five people that I know of who have those events in personal experience, one of them being Sanat Kumar and he’s dead, the other being the Sentinel, who is also dead. Six, if I count the Jewel, and I should. That’s why I know those things, and all kinds of “spiritual people” don’t. I was there. I participated in cooking up this mess, and I am here to clean it up. I’m not some phase in spiritual evolution, the way people imagine those things. I’m not some guy who practiced yoga a lot. It just took a lot of effort to remember some of these things here, in this mud, and to repeat initiations from below, in the body.

Why was Buddha the first one to ever figure out Sanat Kumar down here? Because he seems to have been the first one to actually do anything Sanat Kumar minded enough to try to interfere. Why all kinds of “great teachers” completely failed to figure him out? Because they never did anything he had a problem with, probably. It’s interesting how Jesus had all kinds of issues with him, and “great saints” like Ramakrishna and his disciples had none. It kind of tells you something. Why did Satan interfere with me so much? It kind of tells you something, doesn’t it? If a dog is growling at the woods, you tend to wonder what is it that he’s seeing there that you aren’t.

Reasons

I can imagine that people reading the last articles are trying to figure out the reasons why I wrote them. They are not very complicated. Biljana opened her gaming laptop to play Witcher 3 and the Windows basically kept it under lockdown with all the stupid updates, making it impossible to actually run what she wanted, until she told it to lay off with the updates for a week; then it ran fine. It got me thinking – Microsoft behaves as if the computer belongs to them first and user last, and the actually important stuff is all about installing updates and running things the OS thinks should be ran, and you get the leftovers, if you’re lucky and it doesn’t just do the reboot-update thing where the system is completely useless for hours. Also, it doesn’t actually bother to ask, because it knows better. I was thinking about it and concluded it’s not an accident, it’s a long-standing company policy. It’s the way they understand the computers, the users and the world. What they want and think matters; what you want and think is irrelevant, because they know better.

About the watches; I already mentioned I have issues with allergies. My nose is completely blocked and this impairs my breathing and elevates my stress level in addition to all the other things that are making my life miserable, such as filtering the astral equivalent of global sewage until it’s Evian. Well, it’s not just my breathing; my wrists are slightly swollen too, and my watch has a metal bracelet that’s adjusted to my normal wrist size, and the extra links for it are somewhere in Zagreb in a garage, and one would have to dig it out, mail it to me and then I’d expand the bracelet so that it doesn’t dig into my flesh, and that would solve the problem, but until then I can’t wear it. As you can see, it’s a whole to-do list. The obvious solution was to just wear another watch, with the leather strap, but my second watch is a battery powered quartz, and the battery just happened to die a month ago. Yes, I have a third watch, a twenty year old Casio, and it’s also quartz and the battery also died. That’s what got me thinking about watches, especially considering the fact that my main watch, the mechanical one, needs servicing since I’ve been wearing it non-stop for 8 years or so, and I’ll do that when I go to Zagreb in November to put the winter tyres on the car. So, considering I would have to be without a watch until then, I decided I had to do something and just bought a quartz movement Seiko with a leather strap, and the watch happened to be so nice, Biljana commented that she can’t actually tell how expensive it was – it doesn’t look worse than something like a JLC Master series in stainless steel, for instance.

This got me thinking about what are we actually paying for in watches, especially since I know that JLC Geophysic, released in the geophysics year along with the Sputnik 1, was intentionally designed to tick at true seconds, making it look like a quartz watch, only there weren’t quartz watches in the 1950s so people thought it was fancy. So, the thing that now makes people think a watch is “cheap”, the ticking at true seconds, is something JLC invented an expensive complication for in the 1950s. And yes, the Seiko I bought looks almost the same; only more accurate, and all for 230 EUR. The honest answer is that we are paying mostly for illusions and bullshit, and only somewhat for better materials and tolerances. We’re definitely not paying more for accuracy, or resistance to shocks or magnetic fields. So, that got me thinking and I wrote the article about it.

Also, I was thinking how a watch is just physical matter until I bind spiritual energetics to it, which is the point where it actually becomes something special and precious, and overpaying for matter that pretends to be something special just so that I would have to turn it into something actually special is pointless. And while we’re at that, since I was too exhausted and brain-dead from the spending to do anything complicated and elaborate, I merely punched a hole from the watch to the “God realm”, in order for it to create a feeling of presence when I wear it. I expected nothing from it, but a very old and dear friend paid me a wordless visit through that thing. It helped, my Lord. Thank you. I hope to see you soon for coffee.

The Windows update machine

I heard an anecdote from the 1980s, when Microsoft programmers who developed software for the Macintosh platform joked that on a Mac, keyboard interrupt has higher priority than the hard drive interrupt, which they considered supremely silly, because of course hard drive is a more important part of the computer. What they didn’t realise is that when keyboard isn’t responsive, the user thinks the machine is dead and panics, so it’s extremely important to keep the user interface responsive even when the machine is stressed. If hard drive takes somewhat longer to do its thing, however, nobody neither notices nor cares.

It’s a matter of corporate culture, obviously, and it persisted to this day. When Mac OS has an update pending, it notifies me and goes away. When I’m ready to let it update the machine, I let it know and then it does its thing. Other than that, it gets out of my way and lets me do the important things. On a Windows machine, however, the first thing it does is start downloading and installing updates, which makes the machine hot, loud and slow. A Windows machine thinks updates are the most important thing in the world, because it’s a self-serving mess. To a Windows machine, the user is an unimportant addition, someone who was allowed to use it, but otherwise doesn’t matter. The machine serves itself, the OS serves itself, and its updates, security and similar buzzwords nobody really cares about are the most important things. The user comes last, after the OS is happy because it finished doing the “important” things with 100% of resources. Only then can the user get the leftovers.

This, among other things, is the reason why I’m writing this on a Mac.

Hype and tradition

Having nothing more useful to do at the moment, I did some research regarding the watch industry, since it’s the epitome of selling hype and illusions for inordinately overblown amounts of money.

They justify the prices by showing us the picture of an aging watchmaker patiently assembling the movement, and the idea combines low volume, skilled manual labor, and tradition.

So, let’s start with tradition. Which are the oldest watch companies currently in operation?

Blancpain, founded in 1735, is the oldest; however, it shows the typical pattern of being a dead brand revived with venture capital after the so called “quartz crisis” in the 1970s-1980s; currently owned by the Richemont group. The pattern consists of a venture capital finding and buying the dormant assets, and, sometimes, finding a grandson of the last owner and getting him to serve as a figurehead. In other cases, if the company was in a dire situation but alive, it is bought by either the Swatch group, or LVMH, the luxury goods conglomerate, or the Richemont group.

Let’s see the others. Vacheron Constantin, founded in 1755, continuously operating since, owned by the Richemont group.

A. Lange & Söhne, founded in 1845, dead, resurrected in 1990 by venture capital, owned by the Richemont group.

Zenith, founded in 1865, survived the Quartz crisis, author of the famous El Primero movement that Rolex outsourced from them to power the famous Daytona. They are the traditional in-town competitor of Jaeger-LeCoultre. Purchased in 1999 by LVMH.

Jaeger-LeCoultre, founded in 1833, famous for making not just watches, but also the movements for other famous watchmakers, owned by the Richemont group since 2000.

IWC Schaffhausen, originally founded in 1868, went under in the quartz crisis, owned by the Richemont group since 2000.

To make it shorter: Blancpain, Breguet, Certina, ETA, Glashütte Original, Hamilton, Harry Winston, Longines, Mido, Omega, Rado, and Tissot, all owned by the Swatch group, which rose to prominence in the 1980s and made a fortune on mass-produced fashion watches powered by quartz movements; they invested the money by buying up the bankrupt watchmaking companies.

A. Lange & Söhne, Cartier, IWC, Jaeger-LeCoultre, MontBlanc, Panerai, Piaget, Roger Dubuis, Vacheron Constantin, Van Cleef & Arpels belong to the Richemont group.

TAG Heuer, Hublot, Bulgari, Zenith, and Louis Vuitton are owned by LVMH.

One would be justified in asking if there are any actual watchmakers with continuous tradition that aren’t operated by the fashion brands and venture capital? They exist.

Patek Philippe, established in 1839, remains the last family-owned independent watch manufacturer in Geneva.

Rolex, founded in 1905 as a marketing brand that outsourced the actual watchmaking to others, invented some of the crucial mainstays of the watch industry, such as weather sealing and self-winding, not to forget the concept of wearing the watch on the wrist, on a stainless steel bracelet. They started as a marketing company and remained masters of hype, and regardless of that, they are actually one of the big innovators in the history of watchmaking, and the biggest, most recognizable name today.

Seiko, founded in 1881. Self owned, and the only vertically-integrated watchmaker in the world, alongside Rolex. They originally made mechanical watches, but produced the first commercial quartz watch in 1969.

Citizen, founded in 1918.

Casio, founded in 1946. as a calculator company, started making quartz watches since 1974.

So, wait a minute. If you want to wear a watch that has deep tradition of craftsmanship and innovation, your options are Seiko, Patek-Philippe and Rolex? Yup. Those three actually aren’t owned by hypemasters and have a serious tradition. One could argue that both Rolex and Patek are prime hypemasters themselves, and they wouldn’t be wrong.

But what about craftsmanship, assembling watches by hand, and so on? If you want that, your best choices would be A. Lange & Söhne, Patek-Philippe, and Grand Seiko. However, have in mind that most components today are produced by CNC grinders and similar technologies, and the manual part is usually only about the assembly. If someone makes millions of watches, of course it’s all mass produced, by definition.

So yes, the argument against the quartz movements, that they are mass-produced, is supremely silly, considering how Rolex, ETA, Sellita, Miyota and Seiko movements are all mass-produced, and almost nothing else is used anywhere. That’s fine, because a mechanical watch movement is a solved engineering problem, that doesn’t need to be solved again. As for quality, quartz movements are solid state, no moving parts other than what moves the indicators. They should outlive everything, and they usually don’t require servicing. They are also orders of magnitude more accurate. So, why are we being told that quartz is low-quality trash and mechanical is precious? Because of marketing. Billions of dollars depend on us believing that story, or nobody would buy a $10000 Rolex over a $200 Seiko. They convinced us that accuracy doesn’t matter, that accuracy is somehow a worthless feature since every quartz movement excels at it, and “we all know” quartz is crap. Well, pardon me, but in the 1970s and early 1980s I was taught to believe that accuracy is the central feature of a watch, and the expensive watches were expensive primarily because they were more accurate. That’s why the entire industry went nuts when quartz movements were more accurate. They thought it’s all over for them because there was no reason for the existence of mechanical watches any more. Even Rolex went nuts and started making quartz watches, and thought their mechanical watches were now trash. Everything else is just marketing hype that was slowly built since.

They spent 50 years and billions of dollars convincing us that the superior technology, that literally erased Swiss watchmaking, was cheap trash. If for some reason quartz watches weren’t that easy to mass-produce, the industry might have gone the other way and quartz would now be known as super expensive space tech, while mechanical watches were for the plebs.

To add insult to injury, most “traditional” brands that make mechanical watches today have almost no claim to a horological tradition if compared to someone like Seiko, who are generally assumed to be a newcomer to the industry, while in fact they are a seriously old brand with incredible legacy in watchmaking. Honestly, if you want a watch with a claim to tradition, craftsmanship and innovation, buy a Seiko. It’s not going to be a status symbol in a sense that it’s very expensive and few can afford it, but status symbols are a tricky thing anyway. People think Rolex is a status symbol, but sometimes it’s merely part of the uniform, something people think they need to have in order to be “taken seriously”, like a suit and a tie. Also, I’ve seen that the reaction to people who have a Rolex is usually negative – yes, a Rolex is recognized, but it’s usually recognized as something wannabes, snobs and people without taste wear to show how much money they have. On the other hand, I never saw a negative reaction to a Seiko, or, for that matter, IWC or Zenith. If they are perceived, and they seldom are, they are perceived as “a nice watch”. If a Rolex is perceived, it marks you as an asshole with a Rolex. So yes, it’s a status symbol alright, but not of the kind I find worth acquiring.