In mathematics, there’s a simple way of proving a theorem. You try to prove the opposite of what it states. If an attempt to do so leads to contradiction, the impossibility of the opposite is taken as proof of the original thesis.

The implication, of course, is that something cannot be both true and false at the same time. Barring quantum superposition, let’s assume this to be universally valid, and let’s assume that if something can be proven as both true and false at the same time, it means that the thesis was incorrectly postulated.

The leftists have a fundamental problem. They state that diversity is good and that tolerance is good, and therefore different religious ideologies need to be accepted as an aspect of diversity, which is their argument for embracing Islam. On the other hand, they vehemently oppose fascism and try to outlaw it and imprison its proponents. The rationale for that is that fascism is an inherent danger to the basic tissue of a liberal, tolerant society, as it is inherently intolerant and authoritarian, and tends to erase all different opinions, ideologies and peoples.

So, let me exercise a rhetorical instrument called “sarcasm” and show the problem I see in the left’s defense of Islam:

Islam is, in fact, wonderful. As a Nazi, I love it. No wonder Hitler admired it so greatly and even considered having it as official religion. In Islam, you get to either kill or submit your enemies, they have to accept humiliation and additional taxation and you can always treat them badly with impunity. Women are treated like a support service for men, good only for sex, reproduction and making food, and they can’t interfere in men’s business. All those faggots and perverts can be expunged from society, along with other degenerates. Also, you get to have proper elections, where the candidates are inspected by a religious committee to ascertain if they have proper views, so that there can be no changes in policy and no surprises. Only the right side is allowed to compete and win. All that feminist, communist and liberal scum can finally be put to death.

Get it? There is no significant difference between Islam and National-socialism. Both are inherently anti-liberal, totalitarian political ideologies powered by the conviction of some cosmic rightness, from which they derive the right to rule mankind and kill or subjugate everybody who either opposes them or is recognized as a member of the inferior classes of men.

To tolerate Islam, or to tolerate National-socialism, disqualifies one as a tolerant, liberal person, because tolerance of the extremely intolerant is basically intolerance, since you then need to oppose those who are concerned with the intolerant systems as intolerant – Naziphobic or Islamophobic. The weirdest thing is, those who embrace tolerance are indeed intolerant towards some intolerant systems – they are intolerant towards the fascists, racists, gay-bashers and women-haters, but for some insane reason, probably attributable to infusion of money from the Islamic states to the “liberal” NGOs, Islam, which is a women-subjugating, gay-bashing, racist, fascist political ideology of the worst kind, masquerading as a religion, is not only excluded from the group of recognized intolerant and unacceptable ideologies, but somehow manages to pose on top of the oppression-olympics list of victims.

I’m a cynical and sarcastic bastard, but not even I could make up shit like that.

Imagine accusing Hitler of antisemitism. Imagine accusing a Ku-Klux-Klan member of racism. Imagine accusing Stalin of communism. Imagine accusing Jack the Ripper of misogyny.

Ridiculous, eh? They would either laugh at you or stare blankly at you not understanding what the fuck are you trying to do, or confirm proudly. In any case, you wouldn’t accomplish jack shit.

And here we have the leftists who continuously go around accusing white men of racism, misogyny, bigotry and all sorts of nonsense, with the purpose of making them feel guilty enough to vote for a black poseur or a female criminal, tax them and drain them for all kinds of unfair benefits.

Is this shit for real? Let’s say the white men really are misogynes[*] and racists. Guess what’s the probability of a woman trying to do a follow-up on a black guy in a party that was founded by Dixieland in order to oppose abolition of slavery (look it up). Where the Democratic party was Sinn Fein, the Ku-Klux-Klan was IRA. So basically, if a party that used to hang blacks on trees if they looked at them the wrong way ended up electing a black candidate for president, and he ended up winning two terms, it’s proof that white racism doesn’t really exist in America as a realistic thing. Black racism, that’s a different matter entirely. The blacks are allowed to be as racist as they feel like, because whites are the only ones who can be influenced by this kind of guilt. A black person will go around all day saying how he hates white people and how they should all be killed, but if you tell that person he’s racist, he’ll just laugh at you the same way a KKK member would laugh at you if you accused him of being a racist. They would both think you’re an idiot.

If some label does in fact apply to someone, you can tell it by the fact that using it to induce guilt in that person doesn’t work. You can’t influence a true racist by telling him he’s a racist. I knew a true misogyne, a closet-homosexual who used to openly rant about how women are disgusting. If you told him he’s a misogyne, he’s just blankly stare at you, because it doesn’t work. Of course he is, he just told you he hates women and finds them to be disgusting subhuman trash that should be kept on a short leash. Of course a KKK member doesn’t have a problem being called a racist, he’d confirm and go on about how those damn niggers need to be hanged from trees and kept in fear and submission. Calling such people misogynes and racists is like trying to make me blush by calling me a yogi. I’d just look at you and try to figure out what the fuck are you about.

So basically, wherever this kind of debate tactics are used, they are self-canceling. If you use it on someone, it obviously doesn’t apply.

[*] A linguistic correction: a practitioner of misogyny is a misogyne, not a misogynist, just like a practitioner of misanthropy is a misanthrope, and not misanthropist. The French got this right, the Americans as usual fucked this up, because the fake scientists on their liberal colleges don’t really know Greek, they just want to use enough of Greek-sounding words in order to sound like scientists.

I have several observations. First, the color revolutions are coming home. It’s all Soros funded, like the shit he attempted in Russia, Ukraine and other places, with varying degrees of success. Also, the method he used here in Croatia to destroy our culture, by purchasing the media in order to control the public narrative, and financing all sorts of shitty NGOs that promote anti-civilizational values (when you ignore the meaningless buzzwords such as “democratic”, “open” and “tolerant”), it’s all come back to America. There’s no longer a difference from the psyop used to subjugate other countries, control and subvert their election process and their governments, and the psyop that is used in America. America is now merely another victim of the shit it used to export to us. The only countries that are completely resistant to this are the Islamic countries, which export their own variety of bullshit, and Russia, which figured it all out and outright banned Soros and his propagandist servants.

Second, although they usually use the buzzword “democratic”, those people are everything but. Whenever they don’t like the result produced by the actual democracy, they bring thousands of people on the streets to paralyze the society and cause chaos. The thing is, the amount of votes those protesters could cast in the elections is negligible. They already voted, and turned out to be a minority. The interesting thing is, Americans themselves defined terrorism as an attempt by a political minority to influence the society by non-democratic means. That is exactly what this is: a minority that lost the elections wants to overturn the result of the election using non-democratic means. They are terrorists.

Third, a country with so many stupid, irresponsible crybabies might be completely incapable of actual recovery. It might even turn out to be so dysfunctional as to simply descend into chaos and violence.

Essentially, that’s what you get when you indoctrinate young people with completely unrealistic ideas, such as group identity politics, human rights, sensitivity-based speech and actions, and basically the concept of big, over-reaching governments that is supposed to “right all wrongs”. Essentially, the Americans first invented that bullshit as a method of pressuring other countries, but they also kept teaching that in their schools, and when the children indoctrinated on those lies and illusions grew up, they turned out to be entitled, irresponsible, crybaby idiots with demands.

If you want to see why the extremely conservative, Christian positions on society are correct, just take a look at what happens to society when you try to remove them and base the society on atheism, entitlement, sensitivity, group identity, and the concept of rights instead of duties. You get a dysfunctional society full of people of low intelligence and high indoctrination.

Whenever some bad shit happens, it’s always other people’s fault. You’re fine. Nothing wrong with you in any way.

When your government kills people, supports terrorists, dumps toxic waste into the environment, cuts down forests or introduces shitty laws, it’s not your fault. It’s the government. It’s the other people.

It’s the politicians, the rich, the elitists. They are evil, corrupt, deformed, they serve Satan. But you, the common people, you are good, right, proper, decent and you serve God.

You just want to have safety, food, water, gas, job and other infrastructure. You’re going to protest if you don’t get it, and you’re going to remain silent if you’re pleased.

You just want to be happy and want your children to be happy. The duty of the politicians and the industrialists is to figure out how to make the details work. You don’t want to know. You don’t want to dirty your hands with the messy details. You will just vote at the ballot box and you will vote with your wallet at the store. You just want results.

You are great. If only the rest of the world was as good and decent as you. If only you could get rid of the politicians and the capitalists, who are evil, then all would be great.

Do you even get it, or is my sarcasm so close to your actual opinion that you don’t even recognize it as such?